Talking trade: Trump’s team looks at the done deals

In Photo: President Donald Trump signs executive orders in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington on January 23, 2017. Trump planned to formally abandon the Trans-Pacific Partnership, pulling away from Asia and scrapping his predecessor’s most significant trade deal on his first full weekday in office, administration officials said. At left is Vice President Mike Pence.

According to a document crafted by the Trump administration, a model trade agreement has 24 elements. Second on the list is “trade-deficit reduction,” giving a hint as to why Trump wants to review America’s existing agreements. In January Sean Spicer, his press secretary, said that the administration would “re-examine all of the current trade deals.” A presidential order to do exactly that is reported to be in the offing.

America boasts 14 bilateral and regional free-trade agreements. Trump seems to blame these agreements for America’s large trade deficit. Most economists disagree, seeing it as reflecting macroeconomic imbalances. The agreements are, in any case, with countries representing only two-fifths of America’s two-way trade in goods, and less than 10 percent of its goods-trade deficit. Roughly 77 percent of America’s deficit stems from trade with China, the European Union and Japan. None has an American free-trade agreement.

A focus on trade deficits means that minor deals such as those with Jordan and Oman will not face much heat. Nafta, the agreement with Mexico and Canada, and Korus, the one with South Korea, will face more scrutiny because of chunky American deficits with these countries. Israel is the next-biggest trade-deficit offender, but Trump seems unlikely to attack that agreement, America’s oldest.

A review of trade deals is hardly revolutionary. More recent ones, such as Korus, have standing committees dedicated to monitoring them. Both the Mexican and the Canadian governments have accepted that Nafta should be updated to cover such things as e-commerce. They saw the Trans-Pacific Partnership, agreed to in 2016 by the Nafta three and nine other Pacific Rim countries but then jettisoned by Trump, as part of that process.

Last year geeks at the United States International Trade Commission published a 373-page, evidence-based assessment of America’s trade deals. It found that they were positive, but not transformative, raising GDP by 0.2 percent in 2012 and, in 2014, saving consumers $13 billion through lower tariffs.

The commission also estimated that each of America’s trade deals has tended to improve the bilateral trade balance. Without Nafta, the commission estimated, the goods deficits with Canada and Mexico would be larger by around 3 percent of total bilateral trade. Trade deals tend to slash other countries’ tariffs more than American ones. Thus it is unclear how poring over trade deals will achieve Trump’s goal of slashing the trade deficit.



© 2017 Economist Newspaper Ltd., London (March 25). All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.


Image credits: Doug Mills/The New York Times


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article

Banks and tech firms battle over something akin to gold: your data

Next Article

Trump’s take on corporate tax rate could look very much like Obama’s

Related Posts

Read more

The many roles of an association CEO

I was invited by the Australasian Society of Association Executives (AuSAE) to the second run of its “Association Insiders” webinar series entitled, “The Many Roles of an Association CEO.” AuSAE is the premier not-for-profit professional society representing over 10,000 individual leaders working in associations in Australia and New Zealand.

Read more

Five things you should do to prepare your business for 2021

Small businesses around the globe are among the hardest hit as the health crisis continues to cause economic uncertainty in the country. With the country nearing into a year-long lockdown and keeping up with restrictions, small businesses owners have continued to innovate and work through the challenges, venturing their presence onto online platforms. The convenience of learning how to start a business from the confines of your home, and with the help of other business owners willing to lend a helping hand, has created a space for SMEs to flourish during the pandemic. Whether you’re starting out or looking to expand your business, here’s what you need to know to ensure you keep your business afloat:

Read more

What They Don’t Tell You about Climate Change

Two years ago the world pledged to keep global warming “well below” 2°C hotter than pre-industrial times. Climate scientists and campaigners purred. Politicians patted themselves on the back. Despite the Paris agreement’s ambiguities and some setbacks, including President Donald Trump’s decision to yank America out of the deal, the air of self-congratulation was still apparent this month among those who gathered in Bonn for a follow-up summit.