The Department of Finance (DOF) is pushing for the restructuring of the excise tax on automobiles to help deal with the worsening traffic crisis in Metro Manila and other urban centers, aside from generating funds to support the government’s 10-point socioeconomic agenda.
Finance Secretary Carlos G. Dominguez III said under the DOF timetable, the implementation of the automobile tax increase would begin in 2018, which will give the government enough time to fix the rail-transit system and put in place alternative modes of city travel that encourages people to use mass-transport systems, instead of using their own vehicles.
“If this thing is going to pass, it will probably be effective in 2018. We have a year to fix it. By the way, we are not imposing this merely to make life hard for people. We are imposing this to finance [our] infrastructure needs,” Dominguez said.
The finance chief also said a progressive tax on automobiles should discourage the purchase of new cars that, in turn, will help stop traffic congestion from getting worse and reduce air pollution, and the country’s carbon footprint.
“What’s the point of buying a new car and not moving in the streets? The point of the matter is we want to direct the people to use public transport. We are making big investments in public transport, particularly the bus rapid-transit system, and we’re fixing the trains whose maintenance has been neglected over the years,” he added.
Dominguez said the worsening traffic congestion is not confined only to Metro Manila but also in other major urban hubs, such as the cities of Davao and Cebu.
“We are going to make public transport more available. We have to discourage new cars because just look at the traffic, it’s not moving,” he explained.
The DOF has submitted before Congress in September the first package under its proposed comprehensive tax-reform program.
The first package covers the reduction in personal income-tax rates, with offsetting measures that aim to expand the value-added tax base, adjust the excise tax on petroleum products and index these to inflation, and restructure the excise tax on automobiles, except for buses, trucks, cargo vans, jeepneys, jeep substitutes, single cab chassis and special-purpose vehicles.
According to Finance Undersecretary Karl Kendrick T. Chua, the reforms in the automobile excise tax involve shifting to an ad valorem system that simplifies the computation of the tax.
“Under the proposal, the tax brackets for the manufacturing price or import price can be indexed to inflation once every two years if the United States dollar exchange rate is more than 10 percent. If the movement in the exchange rate is more than 20 percent, then the full movement of the exchange rate will be the basis for the indexation,” Chua said.
Under the DOF proposal, the tax for entry-level cars priced P600,000 and below would go up from 2 percent to 5 percent, while luxury vehicles priced over P2.1 million would be taxed 60 percent of the manufacture and import price, up from the current tax of P512,000 plus 60 percent in excess of P2.1 million.
Chua noted that the car industry has already enjoyed a 10-year grace period of no tax increases.
“Even with a doubling of gasoline and diesel price between 2009 and 2011 to close to P45 and P60 per liter, automobile sales continued to grow strongly,” he added.
Chua said the DOF proposal would affect the top 10 percent of households in terms of income, and increasingly the top 1 percent.
Citing as an example, a young professional who buys a Mitsubishi Mirage HB-8 model will pay P15,000 more for the car under the proposed car excise-tax increase, representing a 3.36-percent hike from the current price.
But a CEO who purchases a Range Rover Sport SVR will pay P838,000 more, or an increase of 24.28 percent from the current price.
Along with restructuring the excise tax on automobiles, the DOF is proposing to similarly adjust the fuel excise tax, which will also affect the rich the most and not the poor.
Studies done by the DOF show that the top 2 million, or the richest 10 percent, consume almost 60 percent of petroleum products and commuting costs. The top 200,000 households, or the richest 1 percent, use 20 percent of petroleum products and commuting costs.
Chua said there is space to raise excise taxes on fuel, which have not been increased since 1997, even with oil reaching $60 per barrel because of its historically low prices in the world market.
Global experts predict the low oil-price regime should stay in the medium-term owing to much slower China growth from 14 percent to 6 percent, the huge oil supply, and the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries decision not to increase crude price to protect market share.
According to Chua, the Philippines currently has a very strong economy that can easily absorb the effects of higher oil prices. As with the automobile tax, raising fuel excise taxes will help address worsening traffic congestion and pollution caused by oversupply of vehicles.
The Japan International Cooperation Agency estimated that traffic congestion cost the Philippines P2.4 billion every day, and that greenhouse-gas emissions are expected to increase to 5.72 million tons a year by 2030 if nothing is done, compared to 4.7 million tons a year in 2012.
Jica estimates also show that in solving the traffic problem, the Philippines stands to save P1.9 billion a day by 2030, or P570 billion a year, from time cost savings alone.