AN airline customer, already seated comfortably in his assigned seat, is dragged out of the plane because of an overbooking case. A passenger ferry collides with a cargo ship and a number of people get hurt or die. An oil spill occurs, negatively affecting the livelihood of the affected towns. A whistle-blower talks about taxpayers’ money being squandered by a greedy few, driving people to march in protest and anger. A White House spokesman sparks outrage after stating a politically and culturally incorrect parallel between Hitler, the Nazi dictator; and Assad and his actions in Syria. A Malacañang mouthpiece engages a beat reporter in heated debate.
The situations are all too familiar. Bad news breaks or a crisis occurs, and a spokesman is thrown in the limelight to face a probing media. He is asked a hard question and he stutters, murmurs a shabby retort or worse, delivers a preposterous spiel. You can see the anxiety in his countenance. The media faceoff stands on shaky ground.
Crisis communications guru and former reporter Jeff Ansell deals with moments like these in his book When the Headline Is You: An Insider’s Guide to Handling the Media. In truth, most people react in varying ways when confronted with a potentially damaging question. “They hold their breath, stop listening, feverishly think of what to say, turn negative and defensive, and have an out-of-body experience,” Ansell said.
To answer a potentially damaging question effectively and with honesty, spokesman should first of all breathe, ask themselves how they want to come across—honest, trustworthy and accountable—and learn the media techniques to help them find the right words.
Ansell shared his value-based communications module for working with journalists: Understanding how the media works, how to communicate a message effectively, how to build drawbacks. There are case stories and media-messaging guidelines, but critical are these key talking points that can be useful in managing reputation, and how to sail through a crisis while keeping away from repeatedly encountered face to face with the media:
Today’s public talks to each other and doesn’t need mainstream media to tell them what or how to think. The practice of traditional PR imposes messages on stakeholders and advises spokesmen to ignore questions reporters ask and simply deliver the deliberately prepared “key messages”. With the advent of social media, those days are over. Instead of talking at stakeholders, corporations now have to listen more than they speak.
Social media represents a game changer for PR, a whole new playing field. With social media, anyone can become a journalist. American political commentator Matt Drudge averred, “We’re all newsmen now.” Bloggers answer to no one; they’re not accountable to any rules; and there are no checks and balances for blogged stories. It’s tougher for companies because they not only need to be mindful of traditional media like they always have been. Now, they have to deal with social media, as well, and they must consistently monitor what’s being said in the online world.
When opening your mouth, make sure you won’t regret what comes out of it. Everything a person says before or after a media interview is fair game to be reported. Interviewees need to see their words as toothpaste. Once you squeeze the words out, you can’t put them back in.
It’s not a matter of reporters twisting your words. They can report them just as you say them and cut you off at the knees. You can control the policy and the communications, and how you get the message across, but you can’t control the media—what the reporter will ask or how media will frame a story.
Trust is a spokesman’s currency. To build trust, especially when the news is bad, spokesmen must be honest, accessible and demonstrate they care about those affected by the situation at hand.
Public-speaking training helps craft stronger media messages. Like it or not, the actual words you use in your messaging are often overshadowed by the style in which the message is delivered. People respond best to what they see and hear and a message delivered flatly can have as much impact as the sound of one hand clapping.
That is not to suggest spokesmen need to be slick and polished. People do not trust slick and polished. A good speaker and, in turn, a good spokesman, is one who looks and sounds like they mean what they’re talking about. An approach to public-speaking training that encourages authenticity can help.
The first step when confronted with bad news is to ask, “What am I made of?” To that end, create a “value compass”. This includes “words that you want to convey in a bad-news situation”. Your value compass can cover the language of honesty, trustworthiness, transparency, integrity, security, safety and other transformative thoughts. Allow these principles steer your crisis messaging—not the other way around.
The victim, the villain, the hero, experts, witnesses and the village idiot. From the perspective of the media, using this cast of characters is the best way to frame a controversial news story. Thus, you have to understand how the media develops these characters in their stories. Ideally, you want your company to be the hero in any news story. But more often than not, in a crisis, “PR can become the villain and the village idiot.” One way that PR can move away from the villain role is to use what Ansell calls a “problem-solution formula”. He advises spokesmen to admit the problem in the first part of their sentence and then offer solutions in the second part.
News is made up of drama, conflict, controversy, emotion and irony. Reporters stereotype and cast characters to tell the story. To illustrate the preceding point, if you look at a story like the British Petroleum oil spill, it’s easy to assign the roles mentioned above. You have the victims—the people affected, as well as the environment. The villain was the oil company; the hero could be the media, the regulators, or anyone trying to bring out the truth. There are the witnesses—those who saw the situation unfolding and warned of the dangers. There’s the expert who describes how things should be handled or repaired. Then there’s the “village idiot”, who constantly buggers things up and makes an even bigger mess, and that was Tony Hayward, the company CEO who took a defensive and argumentative position. A lot of CEOs like Hayward are not used to being talked to in the manner a reporter will talk to them. In his organization, no one would speak to Hayward like a reporter would—the people he knows and works with tiptoe around him in conversation. A reporter’s approach throws off a lot of CEOs who aren’t used to it.
Skillful PR messaging can’t always smooth out a tough crisis situation. It’s not a matter of PR messaging smoothing out a situation, but their words should reflect a genuine, heartfelt concern for the situation. People don’t trust smooth messaging so PR people must reflect a genuineness and authenticity. The last thing consumers want to see is a rehearsed, insincere message.
Delivering stand-alone statements can help you avoid getting quoted out of context. Keep your messaging simple and don’t weave sentences together because you don’t know which one is going to get used in the story. Apologizing to gain trust is the way to go. As Ansell observed, “Lawyers often counsel clients about the hazards of apologizing, but it’s often the right thing to do.” When lawyers control the message, it does little to establish trust in the court of public opinion.
Being most upset when bad news breaks is good strategy. Amplifying your emotion and concern enhances your credibility. “Know that fact will never win over emotion, and acknowledge the concerns of others,” he declared. For example, when the Catholic Church sex scandal broke out, one high-ranking Church official from Boston came out and said, “I wouldn’t trust a priest right now either.” While this may seem counterintuitive, Ansell said acknowledging the concerns about priests and the Church was the right thing to do.
It can be particularly difficult to respond when you’re put on the spot without much notice. Take it in stride. To this end, three final take-home tips can be useful: “Remember to breathe. Remember your value compass. And remember that your stakeholders need to know how much you care.”
Walking off the set can be as bad as saying the wrong thing. Steve Jobs appeared on cable news and asked the interviewer not to ask him about Apple’s CEO hunt at the time, and then stormed off the set while on the air when the reporter brought it up. The case wasn’t a matter of Jobs’s being naïve, although that was certainly part of it; it comes back to him thinking, “I’m Steve Jobs and when I talk, you listen.”
A reporter has no obligation to respect that. He waved a red flag and invited the topic by asking the reporter not to bring it up. Jobs could have just said, “We’re committed to finding the right person,” but he got so put off by the reporter’s audacity that he couldn’t process it.
Saying “no comment” has always been the equivalent of blood in the water for the media sharks. “No comment” never works. It’s used often because people see it in the movies and on TV. Only guilty people on a public-affairs show say “no comment”, usually with sweat running down their foreheads. If you can’t answer a question, just say why—it’s proprietary information, there’s a legal issue that forbids you to discuss it, etc. “No comment” is a tacit admission of guilt and makes you look like you’re trying to hide something, and that’s never good.
If you want your comments to be off the record, don’t spill your guts first and ask for those comments to be off the record afterward. Don’t say anything off the record that you wouldn’t say on the record. “As a reporter, I had many relationships where off-the-record comments were used,” Ansell recalled. “But those sources knew me and knew I could be trusted. If you’re ever not sure about the relationship, the rule is simple: When in doubt, leave it out.”
Body language has to be congruent with the message being delivered. When someone says something, 55 percent of the way it’s interpreted comes through visually, and 38 percent comes from how it sounds. I think the words have to be bang on, but the real goal is to get the visual, vocal and verbal elements on the same page. If you want to look like you mean what you say, your body language and tone of voice have to match what you’re saying.
Even the most articulate spokesmen say things they don’t mean when the headline becomes them or they’re put on the spot. What’s worst is that “spokesmen are only as good as their worst quote.”
PR Matters is a roundtable column by members of the local chapter of the UK based International Public Relations Association (Ipra), the world’s premier organization for PR professionals around the world. Bong R. Osorio is a communications consultant of ABS-CBN Corp., SkyCable, Dentsu-Aegis Network and government projects, among others, after retiring as vice president and head of the Corporate Communications Division of ABS-CBN.
We are devoting a special column each month to answer our readers’ questions about public relations. Please send your questions or comments to askipraphil@gmail.com