Investors stung by Treasuries rout brace for next Fed blow

A swift reassessment of how high the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates this year rocked the bond market once again Tuesday. The problem for those burned by the now weeks-long slump is that an even bigger threat looms: the growing belief that rates will stay elevated even after the Fed’s inflation fight is over.

Upside surprises in January employment, inflation and retail sales data are fueling both conversations simultaneously. While a higher peak for rates now seems almost certain, the economy’s resilience in the face of almost a year’s worth of aggressive tightening is also increasingly raising doubts over whether the level of rates which can be considered “neutral” for growth is really as low as it used to be.

Fed officials have so far maintained that neutral is still around 2.5 percent—the same as before the pandemic began—and they would probably be expected to return there once inflation is beaten. Any revision of that view would threaten to push yields on longer-term Treasury securities to new highs in 2023.

“Our thought is that markets, and perhaps Fed policymakers, don’t have the right number for the long-run rate,” said Praveen Korapaty, the chief interest-rates strategist at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. in New York. “The labor market continues to be strong. That is going to be a big deterrent to the Fed actually easing aggressively.”

Treasuries began a holiday-shortened week with steep losses after more better-than-expected data—US purchasing managers indices from S&P Global—showed ongoing strength in the economy in February. The benchmark 10-year rate climbed to 3.95 percent, a fresh high for the year. European yields jumped Tuesday too and the bond selloff continued into the Australian and New Zealand markets on Wednesday.

The US central bank has in the span of 11 months raised its benchmark federal funds rate from nearly zero to above 4.5 percent, and now seems poised to take it as high as 5.4 percent by midyear, according to prices of overnight index swaps. It hasn’t been above 5 percent since 2007.

Back then, the neutral rate was also presumed to be much higher—around 4 percent—and the 10-year Treasury yield traded between 4.5 percent and 5 percent. In the years following the financial crisis, estimates of the neutral rate slid to 2.5 percent as investors and policymakers became pessimistic about the economy’s long-term growth prospects.

Anchoring bonds

That has helped anchor the Fed’s outlook for interest rates—officials see the federal funds rate reverting to about 4 percent by the end of next year and around 3 percent by the end of 2025, according to quarterly projections last updated in December—and bolstered buyers of long-duration Treasuries, even after the 10-year yield briefly rose above 4 percent late last year.

But broader acceptance of the idea that the neutral rate—known in economics circles as “r-star”—has gone up would have adverse implications for a Treasury market nursing back-to-back down years. A higher neutral rate should raise yields across the curve, led by rising short-term rates along with some restoration of a term premium for owning longer-dated Treasuries.

“The 2 percentage point drop in estimates of r* following the global financial crisis rests on shaky ground,” Matthew Raskin, the head of US rates strategy at Deutsche Bank Securities in New York, wrote in a February 10 note. “If growth and the labor market remain resilient,” then investors can expect Fed officials to upgrade their estimates, which “would have big implications for longer-run rates,” he said.

Estimating the neutral rate is more art than science, but the Fed spends plenty of time trying to figure it out, and some of its models are showing an increase. One of them, maintained by the Richmond Fed, now has it at about 1.3 percent on an inflation-adjusted basis, up from around 0.5 percent in 2016. That would translate to a rise in the nominal neutral rate to 3.3 percent from 2.5 percent.

The central bank will publish a fresh set of projections at its next policy meeting in March, but policymakers may be reluctant to jolt the bond market with upgrades to their official r-star estimates so soon, according to Gargi Chaudhuri, the head of iShares investment strategy for the Americas at BlackRock in New York. And even if the estimates were to go up, Fed Chair Jerome Powell would probably try to downplay the development, she said.

“The last 12 months of labor market strength is not enough to call for a higher neutral rate,” Chaudhuri said. “It could well be that 2.75 percent, 3 percent is the right level. We don’t know quite yet.”

Changing relationships

Part of the problem relates to uncertainty over the lag time between policy tightening and the impact it has on the economy, as well as how the unusual experience of the pandemic may be affecting it. For many bond investors, that raises questions about how much stock to put into any estimates.

“R-star is a very theoretical concept, and I think it’s really a question of interest-rate sensitivity and the long and variable lags associated with tightening,” said John Madziyire, a fixed income portfolio manager at The Vanguard Group in Malvern, Pennsylvania.

“Interest rate sensitivity is much lower” at the moment because homeowners and companies locked in low borrowing costs before rates began rising last year, Madziyire said. “So, all these rate hikes potentially haven’t really impacted the economy.”

Moreover, a recession later this year or in 2024 as tight monetary policy does finally start to bite—a scenario most forecasters are still calling for, even if so far it’s been delayed — would only prolong the guessing game about the true neutral rate.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article

One year of war against Ukraine: Acting together to ensure international law will prevail

Next Article

Biden in Poland: US, allies ‘will never waver’ in Ukraine

Related Posts

Read more

Jail CEOs of firms involved in oil spills

The 1969 Santa Barbara oil spill was the largest oil spill in United States by the time it happened. While it was a disastrous incident, killing thousands of birds, fish and intertidal invertebrates, along with many dolphins, elephant seals and sea lions, the legacy of the Santa Barbara oil spill is lasting and impressive and includes the creation of the National Environmental Policy Act, the US Environmental Protection Agency, and National Marine Sanctuaries system, which until today is seriously protecting important marine ecosystems around the United States.

Tax Law for Business | Atty. Irwin C. Nidea Jr.
Read more

Your right to privacy and BIR’s subpoena powers

Once upon a time, the BIR issued a revenue regulation (RR) that requires broker dealers to divulge personal information of their clients such as TIN, birthdate, and address. It anchored its directive from the Tax Code where the Commissioner may mandate anyone to reveal information necessary in the performance of his functions. The said RR is a test on how far the Commissioner can stretch this power. If upheld, the floodgates will be opened, and everyone’s personal information will be out in the cold.