TouchPay operator wins in patent license arbitration case

An arbitral tribunal from the Philippine Dispute Resolution Center Inc. (PDRCI) recently directed BTI Payments Philippines, Inc. (BTI) to pay Manila Express Payments System (MEPS) at least P5.3 million over a patent infringement case.

In a resolution, the arbitral body found BTI to have unlawfully copied the patented utility model of MEPS, operator of the “TouchPay” electronic collection system, and to have violated the Intellectual Property Law allegedly in connivance with Electronic Transfer & Advance Processing Inc. (E-TAP).

MEPS had alleged that BTI and ETAP unlawfully copied its automated payment machine.

The case stemmed from a series of raids conducted by the operatives of the National Bureau of Investigation-Intellectual Property Rights Division (NBI-IPRD) in July 2020 and March 2021 pursuant to the Search Warrants issued by Judge Reinalda Estacio-Montesa of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 46, of Manila and Judge Elma M. Rafallo-Lingan of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 159, of Pasig.

During those raids, NBI agents supposedly seized several kiosk machines bearing the name “Pay & Go” with identical flow system and utility model of TouchPay from different establishments in Metro Manila.

TouchPay is an automated payment machine that offers electronic transactions for paying utility bills, prepaid loads and other commercial transactions. It is owned and operated by MEPS and its utility model is registered with the Intellectual Property Office (IPO).

The “Pay&Go” kiosk machines, on the other hand, are manufactured by E-TAP and were allegedly deployed by BTI led by its officers Peter Alexander Blacket, David Scott Glen, Danilo Ibarra, Neil Sison and Alina Sison.

TouchPay has been aggressive at cracking down on machines infringing on its patent model and has been filing cases against other competing payment kiosk providers via the National Bureau of Investigation’s intellectual property rights division.

“Atty. Romina Miranda, the Senior Agent in the Intellectual Property Rights Division assigned to make surveillance and investigation of the alleged alterations of MEPS’ APMs and their being passed on as Pay&Go, testified that she saw personally a number of APMs with MEPS’ serial numbers on the machines that bore the label Pay&Go and altered APMs which are labeled Pay&Go but the serial number stickers had been removed,” the PDRCI tribunal ruling said.

Atty Miranda, the tribunal added, checked the serial numbers of Pay&Go machines and found that they were also the serial numbers of the APMS of MEPS. She saw the altered MEPS APMS that were made to appear as Pay&Go in several venues, which were BTI sites. The Pay&Go machines had the features and functions similar to TouchPay APMs remitting payments through automated payment machines.

“The testimony of Atty. Miranda established and confirmed clearly that BTI disclosed to and shared with E-TAP confidential information on MEPS’s APMs and connived with E-TAP to copy MEPS’s APMS features and intellectual property and deployed and distributed the altered APM machines in various locations in Metro Manila,” the ruling said.

“BTI copied the registered utility model of MEPS ATMS into its APTs of Pay&Go and violated the Copyright law,” the tribunal said.

The decision by the arbitration panel reaffirms the importance and value of intellectual property.

The crimes of trademark infringement and unfair competition are covered under Sections 155 and 168, both in relation to Section 170 of Republic Act (RA) No. 8293, otherwise known as the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines.

The invention or utility model of the TouchPay machines are under patent protection, hence they cannot be used or imitated without the consent of the patent holder, creator or inventor. ###


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article

DBP inspects SteelAsia rolling mill as Bank eyes new financing deal 

Next Article

Going Back to Live Theatre in “Shorts and Briefs”

Related Posts