Cebu groups urge Duterte to intervene in Naia rehab

Manila Ninoy Aquino International Airport Terminal 3 Or Naia, Ma
File photo: Manila Ninoy Aquino International Airport Terminal or NAIA.

BUSINESS groups in Cebu have called on President Duterte to intervene in the approvals process for the P109-billion unsolicited proposal for the redevelopment of the Ninoy Aquino International Airport (Naia).

In separate letters to Duterte, members of the Cebu Business Groups—composed of the Cebu Chamber of Commerce and the Mandaue Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc.—backed Megawide Construction Corp. and partner GMR Infrastructure Ltd. in their bid to rehabilitate the decades-old Naia.

Cebu Association of Tour Guides President Mary Grace Melendres said her group finds the issues being hurled against the Filipino-Indian partners as “harassment.” This includes the anti-dummy case filed before the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI).

“We believe the sole purpose of this issue is to tarnish their reputation given the Naia project and has nothing to do with the airport’s management,” Melendres said in the letter.

She also called the two companies, which has been developing and operating the Mactan-Cebu International Airport (MCIA) for years now, as assets to the “advancing of Cebu’s tourism image as tourist arrivals greatly increased.”

She cited 2019 data, which showed that 13 million passengers traveled through the airport last year, double the volume recorded six years ago at 6.5 million passengers per year.

“The solid partnership of Megawide and GMR has been an asset to Cebu boosting local tourism and the regional economy. MCIA excellent operations has provided jobs and livelihood to Cebuanos and business growth opportunities for local entrepreneurs that include us,” Melendres said.

In a separate letter to Duterte, local supplier Vertical Difficult Access Solutions Inc. President Eduardo Solana Jr. said third-party partners of Megawide and GMR are “very much satisfied with how the MCIA is operated and managed.”

He said the cases filed against the two companies are nothing but aggravating issues that inhibit the companies from quickly modernizing the old airport.

“The case is nothing more than a nuisance issue meant to tarnish the company’s reputation in connection to the private contractor’s Naia rehab bid,” he said.

In yet another letter, Prime Care Alpha Covid-19 Testing Laboratory Head James Peter S. Aznar said the modernization of the prime air hub is necessary not only to jumpstart the country’s tourism and economy.

A modernized airport, he said is “the first line of defense” in the fight against Covid-19.

“We strongly believe that Megawide and GMR are also the nation’s best bet to revive the glory of the country’s airports most especially the country’s primary gateway, the Ninoy Aquino International Airport,” Aznar said.

To recall, the Manila International Airport Authority (Miaa) revoked the original proponent status of Megawide for its P109-billion unsolicited proposal, after it found that the company could not allegedly fund the equity portion of the project.

Before the revocation, however, Megawide submitted various documents that support its claim that it can fund the project through its partnership with GMR, as well as the issuance of preferred shares to raise fresh capital for the airport project.

The consortium submitted these, including other requirements like a joint solidary agreement, on November 20 and December 1.

The OPS of Megawide was revoked on December 15, after a December 4 meeting that based the revocation on the Neda’s earlier findings.

During a Senate hearing, Transportation Secretary Arthur P. Tugade said the consortium may file an appeal before the Miaa board, which will soon convene to discuss the merits of the motion for reconsideration.

Megawide filed a motion for reconsideration on December 21.

Megawide has proposed to implement the P109-billion project between seven to five years in three phases.

The first phase includes the immediate improvement of the airside and landside segments of Naia through the improvements of the existing terminal and the optimization of the existing runways.

The second phase involves the construction of a new passenger terminal building and the improvements of the apron and taxi lane to provide access to the new terminal. The group will also relocate the cargo terminal and the fuel farm to accommodate the new terminal building.

The last phase will see the group building a rail-people mover system that will allow passengers to move from one terminal to another through an overhead railway system.

Should Megawide fail to win this appeal, the government has two more unsolicited proposals for the Naia lined up: one from Philippine Airports and Ground Services Inc. and another for San Miguel Corp.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article

SMC completes target 156 RFID installation sites

Next Article

DOH says saliva-based Covid testing a potential alternative

Related Posts

Read more

ITDF donates 100k to support CCT relief operations

Headed by Board of Directors for Partnerships and Implementations, Charlie Fernando and  Sharon Tan—the Invest to Donate Foundation (ITDF) donated P100,000 to the Center for Community Transformation—through CCT Head of Partnership Arlene Sy, to help fund the latter’s relief operations for the victims of Typhoon Paeng in October.