Why big nations have been brought low by the pandemic

More from author

Newsome sinks clincher for Bolts in OT

Chris Newsome was awesome in regulation and was fuming in overtime to lift Meralco to a hard-earned...

4,000 OFWs stranded in NCR due to PhilHealth’s P960-million Covid testing debt to Red Cross

At least 4,000 returning overseas Filipino workers (OFWs) are stranded in Metro Manila due to delays in...

Editorial: Seeing the potential of plant-based meat

Jackfruit is one of the fruits grown in abundance in the Philippines. The...

India is now the epicenter of the global coronavirus pandemic. It ranks just behind the US and Brazil in confirmed cases and is growing faster than either. The total rose 20 percent in just the last week, despite the fact that India is testing less than most of its peers.

It’s looking increasingly likely that India will wind up being the country with the most cases in the world. This is not just a function of its massive population; China, too, has over 1 billion people. It is a reflection of the fact that big, diverse countries are at a disadvantage in dealing with pandemics.

Smaller nations such as New Zealand or Thailand can manage the flow of cases by shutting down their international borders. But internal borders are as porous in India as they are in the US. Imagine, for instance, how impossible it would have been for Europe to flatten its curve if it hadn’t suspended the Schengen agreement and freedom of movement for its 450 million people. Generally, officials in large nations are reduced to playing whack-a-mole: Even if they suppress an outbreak in Kerala or New York, chances are it will pop up somewhere else.

The pressure to “reopen” in such countries is also greater. Large nations do well economically because they have big, interdependent and diverse internal markets. Consequently, they can ill afford to have those supply chains broken for long. Unlike the US, India was quick to impose a proper nationwide lockdown—at great economic and human cost. Yet now the virus is spreading because people have to move across internal borders if the economy reopens even slightly.

That puts a premium on effective government. Keeping close track of such movements and of every little outbreak would require a centralized state with no shortage of spare capacity—ideally one already primed to spy on its own citizens, such as China’s. For better or worse, no other big-nation government has similar abilities.

In the US, the pandemic has made the consequence of decades of misallocation and paralysis tragically clear. The American edifice of government has been hollowed out and its federal structure made unfit for purpose in a partisan and divided age. This ineffectiveness is reflected in data such as the World Governance Indicators, which has seen the US decline steadily over the past two decades.

The world’s largest economy should not have a state that struggles to respond effectively to a crisis, even a once-in-a-century crisis. India’s state, on the other hand, has always been low on capacity. In fact, it’s a standard joke among policy analysts in India that any conversation about what needs to be done ends with the statement, “But we can’t do that anyway.” The Indian state, at every level, is chronically short of managerial resources, of talent, of resources and of time.

Often, if it does one thing well, something else is shorted. Early on in the pandemic, the southern state of Kerala received praise for how well it had limited the spread of the virus through vigorous contact tracing. But, it turns out, the state devoted so much of its capacity to contact tracing that it failed to ramp up testing. Now state leaders have had to admit that cases are increasing through community spread.

One of the long-term consequences of this crisis will certainly be new thinking about federal states—and a fresh assessment of what in government constitutes “waste” and what is vital excess capacity.

Even in the short term, though, there are quick lessons to learn. Consider one success story in India—the outbreak in the massive Mumbai slum of Dharavi, where Slumdog Millionaire was famously set. Early on, it seemed that Dharavi would almost certainly suffer an exponential rise in cases. Instead, an innovative combination of privately staffed fever clinics, repurposed public infrastructure and manpower from nongovernment organizations managed to flatten the curve there.

When the state has insufficient capacity, it needs to strike alliances like this with players in the private sector and nonprofits. In fact, that’s one mistake Kerala made: The Communist-run local government waited too long to incorporate the private health-care sector in its plans, undoing much of its earlier success.

Large countries with under-performing states need to shift approach swiftly. In Brazil, an uncooperative national leadership has already forced communities to turn to local organizations and transnational nonprofits for help. Governments are going to have to treat NGOs and companies respectfully, as partners, if they want to have a chance of getting through this. Bloomberg Opinion

Image credits: AP/Ajit Solanki



- Advertisement -

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

More updates

Digitization not just for coping; embracing it is the way forward

THE only way to come out stronger out of this crisis is to embrace digitization and prevent...
- Advertisement -

Heavy use of loans for climate aid a ’scandal’—Oxfam

BRITAIN-BASED international nonprofit Oxfam said climate financing extended by developed countries is smaller than the declared amounts. In its Climate Finance Shadow Report 2020, Oxfam said the true value of support of developed countries for climate action may be as little as $19 billion to 22.5 billion per year...

DBCC may downgrade GDP outlook further

FINANCE Secretary Carlos G. Dominguez III said the Cabinet-level Development Budget Coordination Committee (DBCC) may once again revise its outlook on the Philippine economy to take into account the impact of the government’s decision to revert to a stricter lockdown in August after the number of infections rose with the easing of...

Northwest Palawan oil extraction by 2026–PNOC-EC

THE government expects to extract petroleum reserves within the northwest Palawan basin as early as 2026, a year before the Malampaya gas field runs dry. During the Senate budget hearing, Philippine National Oil Co.-Exploration Corp. (PNOC-EC) President Rozzano D. Briguez said drilling activities for Service Contract (SC) 57 would...

PHL has 4th worst pension of 39 economies–report

THE Philippines has the fourth worst pension among 39 economies in the world, and it has to improve the adequacy and integrity of its retirement income system, according to a report. In the Mercer CFA Institute Global Pension Index 2020, the country received a dismal 43 out of 100...
- Advertisement -

More updates

Heavy use of loans for climate aid a ’scandal’—Oxfam

BRITAIN-BASED international nonprofit Oxfam said climate financing extended by developed countries is smaller than the declared amounts.

In case you missed it