Regulatory relief

Regulatory relief are measures effected by regulators to achieve administrative simplification or deregulation to reduce the burden of regulation due to some compelling reasons. Regulatory relief can take different forms for different regulatory activities, and for different objectives.

Thus, it can take the form of a relaxed regulation, such as by providing exemptions from specific requirements. It can take the form of a total deregulation, meaning the suspension of certain regulatory requirements or the repeal of regulatory provisions, or the adoption of regulation that lessens the burden of regulation. To illustrate, in financial regulation, a deregulation removes regulatory constraints in order to achieve a greater efficiency. An example of an objective for regulatory relief is to reduce the amount of resources devoted to enforce obsolete or unnecessary regulations. A reduction in filing requirements, a reduction in duplication of requirement, simplification of procedures, elimination or modification of rules that are no longer relevant are often examples of reasons for regulatory relief. It can also be by tailoring a requirement so that it still applies to certain entities but does so in a less burdensome way.

Regulatory relief in the Philippines

One form of regulatory relief is the adoption of regulation that lessens the burden of regulation. An example is the adoption of the Anti-Red Tape Act of 2007 (Republic Act 9485). Through the law, it mandated the processing of licenses and permits within a specified number of days. It also provided for the adoption of the “Citizens Charter.” These, in effect, provide relief for the general public from burdensome government regulations.

In 2016 an initiative was launched to remove outdated and unnecessary government rules and regulations. The project focused on the repeal of outdated department orders and rules of attached agencies. It was called Project Repeal. Its objective was to reduce the cost of compliance for businesses and the cost of administration and enforcement for the government.

The need for regulatory relief is most relevant, especially in over-regulated industries. Indeed, while regulation is oftentimes necessary, excessive regulation can be self-defeating. In the insurance industry, strict regulation has been viewed as necessary for financial stability and increased protection for consumers.

In the Insurance Commission

The grant of regulatory relief is impliedly authorized under Section 437, paragraph 3 of the Amended Insurance Code. This provision, in effect, leaves the discretion up to the regulator itself. A question therefore is how much discretion should be given to regulator in granting relief. It is believed that relief can be given to a particular business establishment or to an entire industry. Some view legislation as unnecessary because regulators have already been authorized to tailor or provide exemptions under its rule-making powers.

The Insurance Commission has lifted certain requirements in the processing of claims during disastrous natural calamities. The objective being to expedite the payment of benefits. And insurance companies under conservatorship may be granted some form of relief to facilitate its rehabilitation.

When relief may be granted

IN granting relief, there is a need to gauge whether regulation is lacking or excessive; whether a regulation has become “unduly burdensome.” According to the Congressional Research Service of the United States, “the different objectives and potential benefits of financial regulation include enhancing the safety and soundness of certain institutions; protecting consumers and investors from fraud, manipulation and discrimination; and promoting financial stability while reducing systemic risk. The costs associated with government regulation are referred to as regulatory burden. The presence of regulatory burden does not necessarily mean that a regulation is undesirable or should be repealed. A regulation can have benefits that could outweigh its costs, but the presence of costs means, tautologically, that there is regulatory burden.”


Dennis B. Funa is the current insurance commissioner. Funa was appointed by President Duterte as the new insurance commissioner in December 2016. E-mail:





Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article

The ‘dating app phenomenon’ of digital platforms

Next Article

Why not ‘congestion pricing’ to solve traffic woes?

Related Posts

Opinion - BusinessMirror
Read more

Let’s help preserve humanity’s lifeblood

The Earth is known as the “Blue Planet” because 71 percent of its surface is covered with water. The oceans hold about 96.5 percent of all Earth’s water. Of the waters occupying the planet’s surface, only 3 percent is considered freshwater. And most of this freshwater reserve is inaccessible to humans — locked up in polar ice caps or stored too far underneath the Earth’s surface to be extracted. Furthermore, much of the freshwater that is accessible has become highly polluted. This leaves us with roughly 0.4 percent of the Earth’s water that is usable and drinkable to be shared among seven billion people.

Column box-Sonny Angara 2
Read more

A big push for micro, small and medium enterprises

Earlier this week, we sponsored a measure that will institutionalize the Shared Service Facilities (SSF) Project of the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI). Through the SSFs micro, small and medium enterprise (MSME) qualified beneficiaries are provided with the appropriate machinery, equipment, and tools under a “shared” system that would address known gaps in the value chain, most notably the lack of adequate and appropriate facilities, which hinder them from elevating their products and services and enabling the creation of export-ready goods.

Read more

Women, economics, and economy

IN 1994, Ms. Universe Sushmita Sen gave her award-winning answer to the question of a woman’s true essence. Ms. Sen said, “Just being a woman is a gift of God that all of us must appreciate. The origin of a child is a mother, who is a woman.” Her reply implies that a woman’s reproductive role centers on being a biological bearer of infants—something that is expected and natural.