Online businesses and value-added tax

More from author

Taxability of election contribution

The May 2019 elections are fast approaching. People everywhere, from radio blurbs to...

Tax amnesty

Before the previous year ended, the House and the Senate ratified the bicameral conference committee report on the 2018...

Revisiting the tax liabilities of condominium corporations

Condominiums continue to become an important part of the cityscape of the Philippines. Just taking a walk in Manila, Makati...

AS of 2017 there had been an increase in the share of adults who not only use the Internet, but also make online purchases. Based on reports, purchase transaction through the Internet has grown from 6.3 percentage points to 9.9 in 2017. With the rise of online business stores and with the undeniable convenience they present, it is easier than ever to sell and purchase goods and services online.

In 2013 the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) released Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) 55-2013, reiterating the taxpayers’ obligations in relation to online business transactions. What is relevant to my discussion is the portion which states that existing tax laws and revenue issuances on the tax treatment of purchases (local or imported) and sales (local or international) of goods (tangible or intangible) or services shall be equally applied with no distinction on whether the marketing channel is the Internet/digital media or the typical and customary physical medium.

This brings us to the topic on value-added tax (VAT). As so provided in our Internal Revenue Code, any person or entity, who, in the course of trade or business, sells, exchanges or leases goods or properties, or renders services, and any person who imports goods shall be liable for VAT. VAT is generally imposed on sale of goods in the Philippines as well as importation of goods into the Philippines. Likewise, VAT is imposed on receipts from services rendered in the Philippines. Instead of the VAT, the 3-percent percentage tax may be imposed upon persons selling items and services who make sales/receipts of not more than P3,000,000 a year.

How would the government be able to ensure compliance with the remittance of VAT or percentage tax for online transactions? RMC 55-2013 reminds that business establishments or persons who conduct business have certain obligations to fulfill, one of which would be to register with the BIR and another to file applicable tax returns on due dates and pay the corresponding taxes. However, this would address only the situations where the sellers are actually situated in the Philippines.

In cases of cross-border transactions, where our tax authority has no jurisdiction over the seller, requiring the sellers to register and pay their taxes will be difficult if not impossible to implement. As a result, many online transactions remain untaxed. The challenge is more apparent in cases of services sold through the Internet.

First, receipts from services are subject to VAT only if the service is rendered in the Philippines. In determining whether a service fee is subject to VAT in the Philippines or not, the important question to be addressed is—is the service considered rendered in the Philippines? Specifically, in cases of Internet-related transactions, are the online services that are viewable and accessible in the Philippines by the intended customers considered rendered in the Philippines?

Unfortunately, the Philippine tax laws had not caught up with the developments in the Internet commerce. Tax laws were not developed to address the changes that continue to take place with the developments/changes in technology. Although these are already common situations that are usually encountered by taxpayers and by the tax authorities/tax implementing agencies, our laws are still far from addressing these issues.

Second, even if the service is considered rendered in the Philippines and therefore subject to VAT, usually, the sellers involved are non-residents. The rules require that in such case, the payor of the service fee shall be considered as a withholding agent and be responsible in remitting the VAT. This may be easier to comply in a business-to-business transaction. Individuals, however, constitute a significant number of online customers, making it difficult for the tax authority to implement the payment through the withholding-tax system. This is just among the many situations involving online transactions where tax rules are deficient.

As technology continues to evolve, it brings new challenges. So, too, must the law adapt to the circumstances of the times.

****

The author is a junior associate of Du-Baladad and Associates Law Offices (BDB Law), a member-firm of WTS Global.

The article is for general information only and is not intended, nor should be construed as a substitute for tax, legal or financial advice on any specific matter. Applicability of this article to any actual or particular tax or legal issue should be supported therefore by a professional study or advice.  If you have any comments or questions concerning the article, you may e-mail the author at [email protected] or call 403-2001 local 150.

 

 

- Advertisement -

1 COMMENT

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

More updates

- Advertisement -

Editorial: Madness and character

There are two quotes that are particularly applicable to 2020 and all that has happened. The first is from the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche. He died in 1900 and has had an amazing impact on late 20th and early 21st century thinking. At age 44, he suffered a...

Dispatch from Bicol: The canceled feast

Not in my lifetime, I told myself. Not in my lifetime that the biggest, most important festival in the Bikol region would be canceled. When acquaintances asked some weeks back if it was possible for them to travel to Naga so they could attend the Peñafrancia fiesta,...

Amal Clooney: The world’s Most Fascinating Person

I was intrigued when I received my invitation to join the 18th MAP International CEO Web Conference 2020 the other week. The theme of the conference sounded interesting enough, “A Whole New World: Reigniting the Stalled Global Economy,” but I was more allured by the name of...

ARISE, not CREATE!

Bayanihan to Recover as One Act, Part 2 (Bayanihan 2) was signed by the President on September 11, 2020. Many businessmen, non-government organizations and progressive legislators find the allotted P165.5 billion of the law too trifle and small in comparison to the earlier act passed by the...
- Advertisement -

In case you missed it