Detroit church shields man from deportation to Albania

In Photo: Ded Rranxburgaj holds his wife Flora’s hand during a news conference after taking sanctuary at Central United Methodist Church while facing deportation in Detroit on January 16.

DETROIT—A Detroit church is providing sanctuary for a man in the country illegally who was ordered deported to Albania even though he says that he is the sole caretaker of his wheelchair-bound wife.

Central United Methodist Church officials announced at a news conference on Tuesday that the church is offering sanctuary to Ded Rranxburgaj, 48, of Southgate, who is scheduled to be deported on January 25. The Rranxburgaj family will stay at an apartment in the church indefinitely, church leaders and Michigan United officials said.

Immigration officials told Rranxburgaj last October that he was going to be deported. The administration of President Donald J. Trump has cracked down on illegal immigration since he took office last January.

“This person is not a terrorist. He’s not a threat to your country. He’s trying to make a better life,” said the Rev. Jill Hardt Zundel, senior pastor of Central United Methodist. “I follow a man named Jesus who flipped tables over, who tried to stop oppression. And that’s what we’re doing here.”

This is the first time a metro Detroit church has announced it’ll be providing sanctuary to an immigrant facing deportation under Trump, according to advocates.

United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) policy advises against targeting houses of worship and schools for enforcement actions. The church declared itself a sanctuary in 2017 and gave an African family seeking to remain in the country sanctuary last year before Trump was elected, church officials said.

Rranxburgaj came to the US with his wife 17 years ago. Rranxburgaj said he was granted temporary humanitarian status after his wife was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis more than a decade ago.

He said he has no criminal record and has been working with immigration officials to gain legal status.

ICE Spokesman Khaalid Walls says Rranxburgaj currently is considered a fugitive after not reporting to ICE as instructed last October.

Walls says Rranxburgaj was ordered removed by an immigration judge in 2006, and in 2009 the Board of Immigration Appeals dismissed his appeal of that decision, affirming the removal order. He says ICE allowed Rranxburgaj to remain free from custody while making preparations for his departure, “which he had satisfactorily done.”

“ICE does not exempt classes or categories of removable aliens from potential enforcement,” Walls said in an e-mail. “All of those in violation of the immigration laws may be subject to immigration arrest, detention and, if found removable by final order, removal from the United States.”

Flora Rranxburgaj, 44, who is married to Ded Rranxburgaj, isn’t facing deportation because of her condition confined to a wheelchair, said Caitlin Homrich-Knieling, immigrant family defense organizer at Michigan United, a group that advocates for immigrant rights and other issues.

The couple’s oldest son has qualified for the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program, while their youngest son is a US citizen.

“To not see my wife very sick and to leave my sons and not ever see them again, that’s very, very hard for me and for my family,” Ded Rranxburgaj said. He said he is his wife’s sole caregiver: cooking meals, helping her shower and change clothes.




Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article

No more ‘Filipino time’; it should be on time

Next Article

PHLPost releases stamps on centenary of the apparition of Our Lady of Fatima 

Related Posts

Read more

House bill promoting religious freedom hurdles third reading

The House of Representatives has passed on third reading the proposed Magna Carta on Religious Freedom Act, which prohibits the government or any person to burden, curtail, impinge or encroach on a person’s right to exercise his/her religious belief, freedom and liberty of conscience except if the act results in violence or if it is necessary to protect the public.