Is China’s initiative an answer to financial bubble brewing?

As China concluded its One Belt and One Road Initiative Summit in Beijing last May 14-15, criticisms abound, mostly questioning China’s hegemonic intentions and portents of failures ahead but speculating only based on past anomalous deals, without realizing China’s initiative may be the only viable alternative to  the financial bubble building up anew that will be worse  than the 2008 financial  crisis and the escalation of conflicts that could lead to a possible nuclear war of  global proportions.

On doubting China’s sincerity.  There is  every reason to doubt or  question China’s  sincerity owing to  many past botched deals locally like  the controversial ZTE-NBN and North Rail  projects and China’s control over the National Grid Corporation of  the  Philippines (NGCP), which manages our power transmissions lines, although much of the corruption-ridden failures here are blamed on past leaders.

Malou Mangahas  of  the Philippine Center for Investigative  Journalism (PCIJ) calls the China ties a “Trojan horse trap,”  citing UP Political Science professor Jaime Naval as saying China loans are tied to  an  “extractive”  relationship  of  “digging minerals, lumber and the harvesting of  natural resources.”

She also quoted Dr. Renato  Castro,  a China expert of De la Salle University, to beware the Chinese, because like the Greeks, they bring gifts, which are a trap, making us dependent on Chinese aid, Chinese market, and  vulnerable strategically and politically to Chinese agenda.

Corr’s figures go off-course? Another critic, Anders Corr of Corr Analytics, claims the P8.2 Trillion (about $167 billion) in infrastructures will put  the  country into “virtual debt bondage.”

Corr  recklessly assumed this  will all be funded by China, thus “increasing total Philippine debt to $290 billion (P14.4 trillion). He also assumed interest rate of 10% interest, raising new debt to $452 billion, and  our debt:GDP ratio to 197%, the  second-to-worst in the world.”

On record, China’s loan projects amount to $4.5 Billion, and excludes the numerous grants. China will not fund all as government will spend almost 80% of infra spending. Moreover, interest rates are as low as 0.25% and not 10%,  which  is totally  off-course.

Instead of saying kinder words for China for its massive global infrastructure program and gathering 29 heads of states and top representatives of 130 countries, including the U.S., critics from bastions of neo-liberal economics led by the British “Economist” magazine even sarcastically sour-graped and called “One Road, One Trap.” Whether it succeeds or not remains to be seen, but why tear it down if critics cannot provide a better alternative.

China’s generosity solves own problems?  China’s aggressive investments globally is not really done out of generosity, but is intended to solve its  internal excess productive industrial capacity, otherwise they shutdown operations. So instead of exporting finished manufactured goods, which dominated global trade the past decades,  it is exporting  industrial capital  goods  (i.e., bus assembly plant in Nigeria, and other factories, fast railway networks, huge canals like the Kra in Thailand and in Nicaragua,   power and water  systems  in Asia, South America and Africa, etc.).

This mutually beneficial relationship is what  Xi Jiping calls its“Win-win” agenda. Recipient  countries gain infrastructures and industrial productive capacity, which is much better than  being  dumping grounds  of finished traded  goods, while at the same time it  solves China’s over capacity.

Physical wealth reverses financial bubble.  The solid development in physical wealth creation reverses the empty growth in the financial sector, which is often  plagued with boom-bust cycles, ever since it was liberalized in the name of free trade with the repeal in 1999 of  Glass Steagall Act  of  1933,  which protected and separated commercial and universal banking.

Ever since the last financial bubble burst in 2008, massive liquidity pumping was done thru quantitative easing, bailouts, lower reserves, interest rates close to zero, etc., but only  increased corporate debt  from $8 Trillion in 2008 to $14 Trillion today, a  75%  increase which  was spent mostly  to buy up their own stocks to drive up prices,  triggering financial growth on paper  while the real economy  collapses. This dangerously building up another financial bubble that could burst again, triggering anew more desperate pressures from war-mongers to go to war to boost demand thru more arms sales and extract more value from their ravaged countries.

`The  monetary bailouts have only ballooned Wall Street’s  derivatives  or  fictitious  debts  to an estimated  $750 Trillion,  way above US  GDP of  $15  Trillion a year,  or  even bigger  than  global GDP  of $70 Trillion. Ironically, while the bailouts simmered down volatile financial markets, they are fueling another financial bubble, while the real  economy has been collapsing from  neglect. While big banks were rescued, small banks lending to small businesses creating real physical wealth were forced into bankruptcy. From 2007 to 2012 alone, scores of these small  American banks closed  shop.

Fear China loans or welcome new Marshal Plan? Executive Intelligence Review (EIR) estimates that if the US joins with its  proposed massive National Water and Power Alliance (NAWAPA) that has been ignored by Pres Obama along with the shelving of the US Space shuttle program, total development projects could hit $20 Trillion, or 20 times the Marshal Plan rehabilitating Europe after the war.

While many express wariness against China’s massive loan offers, claiming these are just baits for their hegemonic intentions in exchange later for territory and more natural resources, this may be baseless and speculative as so far  there are no strings attached to Xi Jiping’s “win-win” offer.

These concessional loans are far distinct from most of  the IMF/WB loans we got the past decades, which were mostly program loans to shore up our budget deficits, not to mention the strings attached, unlike China’s project loans, which are really pumped into solid projects that create physical wealth and productive jobs.

There are no fears therefore that foreign borrowing here at low interest rates of 0.25 percent could result in foreign exchange risks in the future like the peso devaluations in the past  decades that resulted in 250-350 percent effective interest rates as we are forced to raise  more pesos today to pay the same dollar  of debts  for  past  projects  like LRT, power plants and dams, etc.

 It’s wise to learn from history. Perhaps, it is wise to learn from history that every time there are solid developmental projects for the good of humankind, the ruling financial oligarchs of this world bank bankroll conflicts and world wars (i.e  the British oligarchs and Wall Street like  the Rothschilds, Harriman, Prescott Bush, et al funded Hitler initially). It is said they are  not  interested in increasing the economic  pie for everyone’s benefit  as they can get a slice of a stagnant pie by control money.

It is surprising while 130 nations were glued on the China initiative, western media has still been pounding hard on Trump and raising the bogey monster that is Russia, or  North Korea’s nuclear threat and British Prime Minister Teresa May’s move to  get parliament’s approval to attack Assad’s Syria.Turkey’s President Edrogan  declares the China initiative will help  kill terrorism,  echoing statements of Helga Zepp Larouche of the Schiller Institute, who is known widely in China  as the “New Silk Road Lady.

History shows that when Abraham Lincoln built the trans-continental railway from East to West Coast, cutting travel from six months to six days, the British empire opposed it as it will develop America’s inland and kill its colonial maritime trade that is  port-based, from which the word opPORTtunity and other words like imPORT, exPORT, rapPORT, supPORT, Report, deport were derived. The British egged on the south into  the American Civil War that killed 600,000 lives.

Today, we  must be  wary of  the propaganda  of  pitting our people and nations against each other against  a baseless  bogey monster  like Russia or  the emerging hegemonic China.  Of course, be wary and always  push for  our  national  interests, but  always build on what is mutually beneficial and what is the common good, but never be crippled by fears that prevent us from moving forward.



  1. The author knows only to comment but don’t know how to think an option. I think he belittle the think tank of Mr Dominguez. Dominguez is a person who never fails and work with details.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article

Imagine 2060: Tomorrow’s Manila reimagined

Next Article

Financial Inclusion Steering Committee

Related Posts