BusinessMirror
  • News
    • News
    • Top News
    • Regions
    • Nation
    • World
    • Asia Today
  • Business
    • Business
    • Agri-Commodities
    • Asean Economic Community
    • Banking & Finance
    • Companies
    • Economy
    • Entrepreneur
    • Executive Views
    • Export Unlimited
    • Harvard Management Update
    • Monday Morning
    • Mutual Funds
    • Stock Market Outlook
    • The Integrity Initiative
  • Sports
  • Opinion
    • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Editorial
    • Editorial cartoon
  • Life
    • Life
    • Art
    • Design&Space
    • Digital Life
    • Journey
    • Motoring
    • 360° Review
    • Property
    • Show
    • Tech
    • Tourism
    • Y2Z
  • Features
    • Biodiversity
    • Education
    • Envoys & Expats
    • Explainer
    • Faith
    • Green
    • Health & Fitness
    • Mission: PHL
    • Our Time
    • Perspective
    • Photo Gallery
    • Science
    • Today in History
    • Tony&Nick
    • When I Was 25
    • Wine & Dine
  • BMPlus
    • BMPlus
    • SoundStrip
    • Live & In Quarantine
    • Bulletin Board
    • Marketing
    • Public Service
    • CSR
  • The Broader Look

Today’s front page, Thursday, September 28, 2023

Subscribe
BusinessMirror
BusinessMirror
  • News
    • News
    • Top News
    • Regions
    • Nation
    • World
    • Asia Today
  • Business
    • Business
    • Agri-Commodities
    • Asean Economic Community
    • Banking & Finance
    • Companies
    • Economy
    • Entrepreneur
    • Executive Views
    • Export Unlimited
    • Harvard Management Update
    • Monday Morning
    • Mutual Funds
    • Stock Market Outlook
    • The Integrity Initiative
  • Sports
  • Opinion
    • Opinion
    • Columns
    • Editorial
    • Editorial cartoon
  • Life
    • Life
    • Art
    • Design&Space
    • Digital Life
    • Journey
    • Motoring
    • 360° Review
    • Property
    • Show
    • Tech
    • Tourism
    • Y2Z
  • Features
    • Biodiversity
    • Education
    • Envoys & Expats
    • Explainer
    • Faith
    • Green
    • Health & Fitness
    • Mission: PHL
    • Our Time
    • Perspective
    • Photo Gallery
    • Science
    • Today in History
    • Tony&Nick
    • When I Was 25
    • Wine & Dine
  • BMPlus
    • BMPlus
    • SoundStrip
    • Live & In Quarantine
    • Bulletin Board
    • Marketing
    • Public Service
    • CSR
  • The Broader Look
  • Column
  • Opinion

Untold stories of Aquino human-rights violation

  • Cecilio Arillo
  • March 12, 2016
  • 4 minute read

column-Cecilio T. Arillo-DATABASEPart Three

Mendiola Massacre: A message written in blood

IT was only 1987, or a few months after the Edsa revolution, that members of the Kilusang Magbubukid ng Pilipinas (KMP) started a vigil at the then-Ministry of Agrarian Reform (MAR) to press demands for agrarian reform. They set up crude tents, clearly intending to stay until their demands were heard. Soon, they were preventing MAR employees from getting in and out of the compound.

On January 19, 1987, KMP leader Jaime Tadeo, a member of the Constitutional Commission who had refused to sign the new Constitution that would be submitted to the people for ratification that February, arrived to seek an audience with then-Agrarian Reform Minister Heherson T. Alvarez. Tadeo was, however, told that Alvarez would be available the next day, yet. When the dialog pushed through the next day, all Alvarez could promise was that the KMP’s demands would be brought to President Cory Aquino’s attention. The following evening, Alvarez advised Tadeo to just wait for the ratification of the 1987 Constitution and for the government to implement the charter’s provisions on agrarian reform.

But Tadeo had already rejected the Constitution, believing that Congress would be dominated once more by landlords and oligarchs who were certain to oppose any radical agrarian-reform changes.

On January 22, 1987, the KMP-led protesting farmers left the MAR compound to march to Malacañang Palace. Along the way, they were joined by other leftist organizations: the proletarian Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU), the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan), the League of Filipino Students (LFS) and the urban-poor organization Kongreso ng Pagkakaisa ng Maralitang Lungsod (KPML). By the time they got near the Mendiola Bridge late in the afternoon, they were 15,000 strong.

Waiting for them were units of the Philippine Constabulary, the police and the Philippine Marines, under the overall command of Major General Ramon E. Montaño, chief of the Constabulary-Integrated National Police’s Capital Command, and task force commander Col. Cesar Nazareno (whom President Aquino would later name director general of the National Police).

According to the Citizen’s Mendiola Commission (as cited by the Supreme Court on March 19, 1993), the body created to determine the facts of that day’s bloody events, violence just broke out spontaneously as the protestors and law enforcers face off even before a dialog could be arranged. There was an explosion and then came empty bottles and rocks hurtling through the air.

As the marchers breached the police lines, gunshots rang out, prompting the activists to disperse and run toward Claro M. Recto Avenue. But the gunshots continued, as the government forces pursued protesters, all the way to Liwasang Bonifacio on the other side of the Pasig River.

After the smoke had cleared, 12 marchers lay dead. Sixty-two others were wounded, 12 of whom fortunately sustained only minor injuries. Several of the wounded subsequently succumbed to their wounds (thus, accounts vary as to the number of fatalities, from 12 to 17 to 19).

The protesters sued the Aquino administration and the military officers involved in the dispersal operation before Branch 9 of the Regional Trial Court in Manila. On May 31, 1988, Judge Edilberto G. Sandoval held that inasmuch as the impleaded military officers had been charged in their “personal and official capacity,” the government could not be held financially liable by the complainants. The lawsuit against the government failed to prosper because the state invoked its immunity, thus: “they may not be sued without its consent” clause of the Constitution (Article XVI, Section 3).

The Mendiola Massacre also led to the dissolution of the Presidential Commission on Human Rights (PCHR) following the resignation of most of its members, led by former Sen. Jose W. Diokno (one of Ninoy’s most-admired political leaders).

The PCHR commissioners resigned in protest over the referral of the investigation of the Mendiola Massacre to a new body, the Citizens’ Mendiola Commission. They felt that the PCHR was not only stripped of its jurisdiction; the seeming loss of confidence in the PCHR had also irreparably damaged its credibility.

The 1988 decision was again upheld by the Supreme Court in 1993, affirming that the government has immunity from suit. Now, with the installation of another Aquino as president, the victims’ families, as well as the survivors, live to continuously seek the elusive justice.

In 2011 several farmer groups and families sought to revive the decades-old case before Justice Secretary Leila de Lima. The second Aquino president, however, seems content with the case resting in the dust. His then-Presidential Communications Development and Strategic Planning Office Head Ramon Carandang, sharing his boss’s disinterest to resurrect the case, said: “[We] cannot keep revisiting issues over and over again.”

The Mendiola Massacre was a message written in blood that the peasants cannot intimidate the Aquino administration. President Cory Aquino faced a credibility crisis: To many, the sincerity of her agrarian- reform program, in the wake of the Mendiola Massacre, depended on the fate of Hacienda Luisita.

The nationalist Renato Constantino wrote of Aquino in June 1987:  “She dangled the probability of a sweeping land reform, but has not taken concrete steps to show how this would apply to her family’s
Hacienda Luisita.” 

To be continued

0
0
0
0
Share 0
Tweet 0
Pin it 0
Share 0

Know more

Know more
  • 4 min
  • Column
  • Life

Preparing your child better for school: Part II

  • Maye Yao Co Say
  • September 28, 2023
Editorial
Know more
  • 3 min
  • Editorial
  • Opinion

‘High rice prices bring risk of social unrest’

  • BusinessMirror Editorial
  • September 28, 2023
Know more
  • 3 min
  • Column
  • Opinion

Paradigm shift at MIAA needed

  • Thomas Orbos
  • September 28, 2023
Tessa Jazmines - Part of the Game
Know more
  • 3 min
  • Column
  • Sports

The old college try

  • Tessa Jazmines
  • September 27, 2023
Know more
  • 3 min
  • Opinion

Armenia says ‘ethnic cleansing’ happening in Karabakh region

  • Bloomberg News
  • September 27, 2023
Know more
  • 3 min
  • Opinion

World’s biggest stocks owner calls out Big Oil as carbon levels go up

  • Tim Quinson | Bloomberg
  • September 27, 2023
Know more
  • 4 min
  • Opinion

Fake coordinates and tanker tricks expose shadowy Russian oil trade

  • Alaric Nightingale | Bloomberg
  • September 27, 2023
Know more
  • 3 min
  • Opinion

India’s clash with Canada threatens to hurt trade, investment

  • Shruti Srivastava | Bloomberg
  • September 27, 2023
Dr. Conchita L. Manabat - FINEX Free Enterprise
Know more
  • 2 min
  • Banking & Finance
  • Column

Stepping back

  • Dr. Conchita L. Manabat
  • September 27, 2023
Know more
  • 4 min
  • Column
  • Life

Rediscovering your love for work

  • Carlo Atienza
  • September 27, 2023
Editorial
Know more
  • 2 min
  • Editorial
  • Opinion

‘Carbon tax will make goods more expensive’

  • BusinessMirror Editorial
  • September 27, 2023
Know more
  • 4 min
  • Column
  • Entrepreneur

Overcoming rejections

  • Coach Lex
  • September 27, 2023
Column box-Al Mendoza-That’s All
Know more
  • 3 min
  • Column
  • Sports

Pilots as triathletes

  • Al S. Mendoza
  • September 26, 2023
Know more
  • 3 min
  • Opinion

Antarctica’s shrinking sea ice hits a record low, alarming scientists

  • Danielle Bochove | Bloomberg
  • September 26, 2023
Know more
  • 4 min
  • Opinion

Biden is headed to Michigan to join the UAW picket line. He’s all-in on showing his union bona fides

  • Seung Min Kim, Tom Krisher & Chris Megerian | The Associated Press
  • September 26, 2023
Know more
  • 4 min
  • Opinion

Macron is pushing Europe into a $900 billion fight with China

  • William Horobin & Ania Nussbaum | Bloomberg
  • September 26, 2023
Know more
  • 5 min
  • Opinion

With a government shutdown just days away, Congress is moving into crisis mode

  • Lisa Mascaro & Stephen Groves | The Associated Press
  • September 26, 2023
Know more
  • 4 min
  • Opinion

Teetering China property giants undercut Xi’s revival push

  • Bloomberg News
  • September 26, 2023
Column box-Integrity Initiative
Know more
  • 2 min
  • Column
  • Economy

Intrapreneurship–an exciting option

  • Henry J. Schumacher
  • September 26, 2023
Fitz Gerard Villafuerte - Personal Finance - RFP
Know more
  • 5 min
  • Banking & Finance
  • Column

10 ways to raise start-up capital for your business

  • Fitz Gerard Villafuerte
  • September 26, 2023

1 comment

  1. P3t3r says:
    April 6, 2016 at 11:42 am

    The end result of agrarian reform was very easy to predict. You have a poor, uneducated farmer, to be given a plot of land that’s too small to improve your lot in life and uneconomical for plantation crops like sugarcane, coconut, etc., a multitude of government restrictions, and a lot of history to show how disastrous this has had on the countries it has been implemented plus our years of implementing our own version. The farmers and their children have rejected the program & idea with their feet by moving to the urban areas for greener pastures raising the national average age to 57. If their life expectancy is 70, in 13 years we may not have an agri sector to speak of and along with it our food security and our vulnerability to the dictation of prices by other countries.
    The truth is, past and present administration had and have no clue to how to address poverty so it passed on the responsibility and flack on the agri entrepreneurs with the help of the leftists who also wanted to acquire positions of political & economic power within government. Its about time we give the free market a chance to prove itself and instead of dictating what the private sector should do, they should just take a supportive role instead.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Subscribe

BusinessMirror
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise with us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Podcast
  • Text-Only Homepage

Input your search keywords and press Enter.