House passes depositor-protection bill on second reading

The House of Representatives, in its plenary session on August 25, passed on second reading a bill strengthening the deposit insurance system in the country

Rep. Nelson P. Collantes, chairman of the House Committee on Banks and Financial Intermediaries, authored House Bill (HB) 6020 to amend Republic Act 3591, as amended, otherwise known as the Charter of the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corp. (PDIC). HB 6020 aims to institutionalize much-needed reforms in the field of deposit insurance, and resolution and receivership of banks. The proposed legislation is intended to ensure the protection of depositors and promote financial inclusion. He expressed optimism that HB 6020 will soon be passed on third and final reading.

PDIC President Cristina Que Orbeta welcomed this development and expressed hope that Senate Bill (SB) 2268, a counterpart bill filed by Senate Committee on Banks, Financial Institutions and Currencies Chairman Sen. Sergio R. Osmeña III, will, likewise, be passed. Senate President Franklin M. Drilon has strongly supported SB 2268. In a general membership meeting of the Makati Business Club on August 6, Senate President Drilon assured that the “Senate remains relentless in passing reform measures that will ensure a better business climate,” including the PDIC bill, to make it a more effective and efficient insurer of deposits consistent with international best practices and for a more effective recovery of creditors against assets of closed banks.

The PDIC president said the reform measures contained in both HB 6020 and SB 2268 will further strengthen PDIC’s
capabilities to more effectively provide protection to the depositing public via more expeditious payment of deposit-insurance claims. These will allow the immediate reimbursement of depositors of their insured deposits as the bills will authorize PDIC to accept evidence of deposit (i.e., passbook, certificate of time deposit, automated teller machine card) as additional proof of deposits instead of relying exclusively on records of the closed bank.

The bills also allow gross settlement of deposit-insurance claim of depositors who are also borrowers of the closed banks. Thus, instead of netting out payables from their insured deposits, depositors will now have the option to settle their obligations directly with the closed banks and get their deposit-insurance entitlement in full.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Previous Article

PBOC wrong-foots analysts with yuan fixing as markets supported

Next Article

Al-Amanah charter amendment and expansion pushed  

Related Posts

Read more

ROI and COI: A tale of two metrics

MOST of us are familiar with the term “return on investment,” or ROI, a metric that helps us understand the profitability of an investment. ROI is the ratio of net income (over a period) to investment (costs of investing a resource at a certain point in time). A high ROI means the investment has made significant gains compared to its cost.