HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  

    How to blissfully ignore

    reasons for 1987 crash

    What were you doing and feeling during the 1987 stock-market crash, which will be 20 years ago this week?

    Having married just two weeks prior, I was about a year into a great new job. When I saw the biggest one-day percentage loss in the Dow Jones Industrial Average on October 19 and the near-meltdown that followed, I froze. I didn’t call my mutual-fund companies or broker. I stayed in stocks, where almost all of my meager wealth was invested.

    It turns out my passivity was the best course. I didn’t need that money for a while and knew the economy was basically solid. Yet I’m not confusing mettle with foresight. I had no idea what was going to happen after the Dow took a 508-point freefall and about $1 trillion evaporated in a single day.

    Various malefactors have been blamed from a ballooning trade deficit to program trading. To understand the lessons of 1987, you need to dispense with the mountains of studies that have been done over the past two decades.

    What’s most important is how focusing on building personal prosperity will keep you in the eye of any market storm. To get an idea of how to survive a panic, you need to know what didn’t happen.

     

    Then and now

    While the end of October 1987 was a stunning glimpse into the abyss of fear, the Standard & Poor’s (S&P) 500 Index was up 2 percent for the year.

    Did a long-term bear market ensue? The following year, the S&P rose more than 16 percent, if you include reinvested dividends. From the end of 1987 through 1993, the index more than doubled in value.

    The blip of Black Monday did little to slow down the US economy. Banks didn’t close. No depression followed. Businesses invested in new technologies that would increase productivity and create jobs. The cyber-tech age was in full bloom.

    The difference between 1987 and today is that many institutional safeguards are in place that will curb market freefalls and ensure liquidity. Yet it’s never enough with little-monitored hedge funds playing a large part in trading. There also still needs to be a single agency policing securities, futures and options markets. No regulator will be able to prevent crashes or prolonged declines. Yet there’s much you can do to shield your money.

     

    Personal-portfolio insurance

    When noting the role of the individual investor in market selloffs, William Brodsky, the chief executive officer of the Chicago Board Options Exchange, said individuals may think, “I’m in for five to 10 years, and I’m not going to sell my index mutual funds or IRAs.’’

    Brodsky described my mindset 20 years ago—and today. As president of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange at the time of the 1987 meltdown, he said the week following Black Monday was “analogous to a tornado. We saw it coming.” Brodsky was speaking at a symposium on October 9 in Chicago.

    There will be more crashes and bear markets. That’s the nature of capitalism. The question is: How do you keep your cool? When do you stay in and when do you bail?

    Whatever happens, the chances are good that you will time any exit or entrance poorly. What if you stayed out of the market in 1988 or the half-decade following the crash? Look at the returns you would have missed.

    Personal time-horizon planning is critical. If you can afford to take a 20- percent loss, how much time would you have to make up the shortfall?

     

    Risk management

    Fear of loss is a powerful motivator in investing, although investors often focus too much on returns and don’t pay enough attention to managing risk.

    Let’s say you learned well from the crash of 1987 and decided to invest across three different asset classes that typically don’t move in lockstep with each other.

    When the dot-com bubble burst, for example, you would have fared better if you followed this strategy. From March 24, 2000, to October 9, 2002, your big-stock stake would have been down about 47 percent in the Vanguard 500 Index Fund, which tracks the S&P index.

    Had you diversified, your stock losses would have been offset by a 26 percent return from US bonds, using the Vanguard Total Bond Market Index Fund as a proxy.

    Adding icing to the cake would be a 32-percent gain in real-estate investment trusts (REITs), as represented by the Vanguard REIT Index Fund. I use these funds because they are low-cost, diversified ways of investing in these asset classes. I own the REIT and bond funds in my retirement accounts.

    Even if you put all of your money on large companies—and stayed invested from the beginning of the Internet crash in March 2000 through October 5 this year—your holdings would have grown 12 percent over that period in the Vanguard 500 fund.

     

    Focus on goals

    You can torture yourself trying to explain why markets rise and fall every day. Don’t trouble yourself. It’s mostly noise.

    Instead, concentrate on your life plan. Are you saving for a home down payment? Do you need money for college? Will a parent need your financial support? Are you planning to leave the work force part-time or permanently soon? What if you are disabled and can’t work?

    You need to weigh your own life needs to ensure that you won’t be devastated by what markets do in any particular time period. That means protecting against inflation, loss of future income and the ravages of bear markets.

    Where are you now and how do you get to where you want to be? It may not matter where you were or what you did 20 years ago. The past is always prologue, yet you need to create your own portfolio insurance to make that next crash insignificant.

    OTHER STORIES
    Editorial: The peso challenge

    THE curious dilemma posed by the steadily rising peso, both to the country’s leaders and various sectors that directly feel its impact, provides yet another argument for the notion that economic growth should not rest unduly on any one sector or activity in order to be sustainable.

    read more

    Dispatches from the Enchanted Kingdom: Gung-Ho or Gone-Hu?

    OVER the weekend one of the country’s leading dailies carried a story that added an interesting angle to that $465.5-million cyber education project that Gloria Arroyo suddenly found to be a very attractive substitute for the aborted $330-million ZTE broadband network deal.

    read more

    Andy Mukherjee: Singh’s nuclear-energy U-turn lets India down

    FOR two years Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, a self-proclaimed “politician by accident,” invested the little political capital he had into reaching an accord on civilian nuclear-energy cooperation with the US.

    read more

    John F. Wasik: How to blissfully ignore reasons for 1987 crash

    What were you doing and feeling during the 1987 stock-market crash, which will be 20 years ago this week?

    Having married just two weeks prior, I was about a year into a great new job. When I saw the biggest one-day percentage loss in the Dow Jones Industrial Average on October 19 and the near-meltdown that followed, I froze. I didn’t call my mutual-fund companies or broker. I stayed in stocks, where almost all of my meager wealth was invested.

    read more

    Omerta: Meralco ‘mandurugas’?

    THERE is this businesswoman and apartment owner in Parañaque. She is so implacably mad at the Meralco that for the past 41 months, she has been settling her monthly electricity bills with a check on which she also writes, in big block letters, the words: “MERALCO MANDURUGAS” (scammer or swindler).

    read more

    Charlotte F. Allen: A good death? I’ll take a pass

    Do I have to have a living will? Last year, I had an experience that gave me the distinct impression that if I didn’t have one, my life was hardly worth, well, living.

    read more