HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  

    Gung-Ho or Gone-Hu?

    OVER the weekend one of the country’s leading dailies carried a story that added an interesting angle to that $465.5-million cyber education project that Gloria Arroyo suddenly found to be a very attractive substitute for the aborted $330-million ZTE broadband network deal.

    A memorandum of agreement for the CEP signed by Trade Secretary Peter Favila and Dr. Kang Ke Jung, a representative of a Chinese company called Tsinghua Tongfang Nuctech Company (Nuctech) in Boao, China, in April, caught the attention of ACT (Alliance of Concerned Teachers), a teachers’ organization opposed to Mrs. Arroyo’s new pet project.

    The teachers could not understand why Mrs. Arroyo readily accepted China’s designation of a company that was not known for education or the use of satellites for delivering classroom lectures through television.

    Nuctech specializes in manufacturing x-ray equipment for container vans, a technology more useful for customs inspections than long-distance classroom education.

    Jesli Lapus, the education secretary, said there was nothing anomalous about the agreement or the choice of Nuctech.

    “Tsinghua Holdings of Tsinghua University owns at least 100 subsidiary companies involved in technology, including Tsinghua Tongfang Nuctech. The bottom line is Tsinghua University, the undisputed leader in open and distance learning, is the Chinese government’s designated contractor for the project, subject, of course, to pertinent Philippine laws,” he insisted.

    But there’s a wrinkle in Lapus’ explanation. The president of Nuctech is Hu Haifeng, the son of President Hu Jintao of China.

    A closer look at the cancelled ZTE deal will show why Gloria Arroyo prefers tied loans with China to similar arrangements with the US or with private corporations that offer to build, operate, and transfer (BOT) at no cost and no financial risk to the government.

    US companies like Arescom submit above-the-table bids because the US has tough laws on American companies that engage in bribery and kickbacks to foreign governments. That makes American proposals very unattractive to Mrs. Arroyo’s administration.

    BOT bidders like Amsterdam Holdings cannot dole out unlimited bribes and kickbacks because they have a profit margin to worry about. Amsterdam Holdings backed out of a partnership with Abalos because the company could not afford to carry the $100-million-plus overprice that certain parties wanted included in their BOT bid.

    So that leaves China, a one-party state where the government holds a majority stake in big companies like ZTE and Nuctech, and where the only ones who can ask questions are the people who should be asked questions.

    Government-owned companies in China are like our government-owned corporations—party faithful and retired cops and soldiers run them. Consequently, tied loans guaranteed by foreign governments are good for the communist party bigwigs.

    That’s why Hu Jintao offered billions of dollars to Gloria Arroyo on condition that she reverse her policy to develop the country’s infrastructure through BOT projects and sign-no-bid contracts with companies he picked. Simply put, Hu names the company, and Gloria names her price.

    It’s clear why ZTE got the deal and why the original contract price of around $160 million ballooned to $330 million. It’s just as obvious why Gloria Arroyo and Hu Jintao are so excited about the cyber-education deal: “Everybody make more money, everybody more happy.”

    Except the Filipino people, who will pay out the billions that will put a smile on the face of Gloria Arroyo and her newfound Chinese cohort.  

    Buencamino writes political commentary for Action for Economic Reforms (www.aer.ph).

    OTHER STORIES
    Editorial: The peso challenge

    THE curious dilemma posed by the steadily rising peso, both to the country’s leaders and various sectors that directly feel its impact, provides yet another argument for the notion that economic growth should not rest unduly on any one sector or activity in order to be sustainable.

    read more

    Dispatches from the Enchanted Kingdom: Gung-Ho or Gone-Hu?

    OVER the weekend one of the country’s leading dailies carried a story that added an interesting angle to that $465.5-million cyber education project that Gloria Arroyo suddenly found to be a very attractive substitute for the aborted $330-million ZTE broadband network deal.

    read more

    Andy Mukherjee: Singh’s nuclear-energy U-turn lets India down

    FOR two years Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh, a self-proclaimed “politician by accident,” invested the little political capital he had into reaching an accord on civilian nuclear-energy cooperation with the US.

    read more

    John F. Wasik: How to blissfully ignore reasons for 1987 crash

    What were you doing and feeling during the 1987 stock-market crash, which will be 20 years ago this week?

    Having married just two weeks prior, I was about a year into a great new job. When I saw the biggest one-day percentage loss in the Dow Jones Industrial Average on October 19 and the near-meltdown that followed, I froze. I didn’t call my mutual-fund companies or broker. I stayed in stocks, where almost all of my meager wealth was invested.

    read more

    Omerta: Meralco ‘mandurugas’?

    THERE is this businesswoman and apartment owner in Parañaque. She is so implacably mad at the Meralco that for the past 41 months, she has been settling her monthly electricity bills with a check on which she also writes, in big block letters, the words: “MERALCO MANDURUGAS” (scammer or swindler).

    read more

    Charlotte F. Allen: A good death? I’ll take a pass

    Do I have to have a living will? Last year, I had an experience that gave me the distinct impression that if I didn’t have one, my life was hardly worth, well, living.

    read more