|
THE
Supreme Court (SC) on Tuesday ordered the Bureau of
Internal Revenue (BIR) to refund or issue a tax- credit
certificate to Manila Electric Co. (Meralco) in the
amount of P107.64 million representing overpaid income
taxes for the years 1987 and 1988.
In an
11-page decision penned by Associate Justice Conchita
Carpio Morales, the Court’s Second Division dismissed
the petition for review filed by the BIR seeking to
reverse the ruling of the Court of Appeals (CA) issued
on August 23, 1995, which affirmed the order of the
Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) for the BIR to refund the
Lopez-owned power company.
Records
show that Meralco had been paying 2 percent franchise
tax based on its gross receipts, in lieu of all other
taxes and assessments, pursuant to its legislative
franchise.
For the
last quarter of December 1987, Meralco filed on April
15, 1988, its tentative income tax reflecting a
refundable amount of P101,897,741 million, but only P77,
931,812 was applied as tax credit for the succeeding
taxable year 1988, leaving an unpaid balance of P23.96
million for 1987.
On June
27, 1988, the BIR conducted its regular investigation of
tax liabilities of the power firm for the year 1987. The
report made by Revenue Officer Frederick Capitan showed
that Meralco was liable for deficiency income tax in the
amount of P2.34 million and deficiency franchise tax in
the amount of P2.84 million.
A year
after, Meralco filed its amended final corporate
income-tax return ending December 1988, reflecting a
refundable amount of P107.64 million.
Thus, it
filed on March 30, 1990 a letter-claim for refund of the
said amount.
Owing to
the failure of the BIR to act on its request, Meralco
filed a petition before the CTA seeking refund of its
overpaid income taxes.
In
granting Meralco’s petition, the CTA held that from the
1987 final income-tax return, the respondent had
income-tax liability of P142.08 million which was set
off against three-quarter payments in the sum of P243.98
million.
Thus,
based on its computation, the tax court said Meralco has
a refundable amount of P101.89 million which the power
company opted to be applied as tax credit to succeeding
taxable year 1988.
However,
in 1988, only the amount of P77.9 million was utilized
as tax credit, therefore leaving a balance of P23.96
million for 1987.
For the
1988 an annual income tax of P62.49 million was due from
Meralco, which it settled by crediting the P77.9 million
excess payment plus payments of P53.33 million and
P14.91 million for the first and third quarters of 1988,
respectively.
Thus,
the CTA said, Meralco overpaid the income tax due by
P83.68 million.
The tax
court noted that in Meralco’s 1988 income tax return, it
opted to use its P23.96 million unapplied balance in
1987, and the P83.68 million overpaid income tax in 1988
be carried over as tax credit in 1989 to 1990.
However,
the amount was not utilized in both years, leaving
Meralco with overpaid income taxes of P108 million. The
CA subsequently affirmed the CTA ruling.
In
upholding the CTA ruling, the SC did not give credence
to BIR’s contention that the CA failed to consider
Meralco’s failure to present evidence to prove its
entitlement to a tax refund or credit in the amount of
P107.64 million.
“The
issue of whether respondent adduced sufficient evidence
to prove its entitlement to a refund is a question of
fact. It bears noting that the tax court and the
appellate court found respondent’s claim for tax refund
or credit meritorious on the basis of the testimonial
and documentary evidence adduced by the parties,” the SC
said.
The SC
said it is “doctrinal” that the factual findings of the
CTA, when supported by substantial evidence, cannot be
overturned on appeal unless it can be proven by the
petitioner that the tax court committed grave error in
evaluating the facts of the case.
The
Court noted that the BIR failed to dispute the
authenticity of Meralco’s quarterly income-tax returns
as well as the final adjustment returns for the 1987 and
1988 and proofs of payment of its tax liabilities.
Concurring with the ruling were Associate Justices
Leonardo Quisumbing, Antonio Carpio, Dante Tinga and
Presbitero Velasco Jr. |