HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    ‘Federalism’ revival bid OK, but . . .
     
    By Butch Fernandez
    Reporter

    SENATE minority leader Aquilino Pimentel Jr. on Monday confirmed his party’s conditional support for the administration’s fresh attempt to amend the Constitution to shift to a federal system of government by 2012, federalization being a long-held position of Pimentel.

    Pimentel said that since he had been pushing for it long before Mrs. Arroyo became President, “the idea that federalism should now be discussed is acceptable to me” because it transcends political considerations.

    But there has been widespread skepticism that President Arroyo is sincere, with certain quarters suspecting she floated the Charter-change proposal anew just to “divert public attention from her present political troubles.” It is a suspicion also held by Sen. Rodolfo Biazon and Sen. Mar Roxas III among the many leading political lights.

    In this situation, Pimentel qualified his view of the idea saying, “Because President Arroyo is like the Greeks bearing gifts [of a Trojan horse], we in the opposition should always be wary of dealing with her.”

    He added that the PDP-Laban’s willingness, and even those of the others in opposition, to discuss federalism in the Cha-cha proposal should not be taken to mean “our compromising the opposition stand against corruption in government, extrajudicial killings, forced disappearances, and the like that mar the record of the present administration.”

    “The discussions on the federalism proposal should not be at the expense of ending ongoing investigations into the ZTE-broadband scandal and other anomalies in the Arroyo administration,” he said.

    Pimentel also asserted that it does not mean the opposition agrees to any ideal of extending Mrs. Arroyo’s hold on power beyond her term, which ends in 2010.

    At the same time, he challenged the Arroyo administration to carry out an honest-to-goodness campaign for the adoption of a federal system to address the age-old problems of overconcentration of power in Metro Manila and misallocation of the country’s wealth among regions, causing discontent and political discord.

    Pimentel admitted he shares the suspicion of many people that the renewed interest shown by Mrs. Arroyo in the federalism idea is a ploy to divert attention from her present political troubles.

    He said a shift from the present highly centralized unitary system to a federal system of government is a long and difficult process that should be undertaken as early as possible without being hampered by any partisan wrangling or selfish ambitions of political leaders.

    Akbayan Rep. Risa Hontiveros said the revival of the Charter-change bid means “the survival instinct of the President is once again kicking in, but this time as a response to a threat within her own base.”

    “The revived Cha-cha call is no doubt diversionary, but what’s surprising is that this new attempt is apparently JDV-less,” said Hontiveros. “When the administration pushed for Cha-cha during the 13th Congress, it was meant to tame or abolish an impertinent Senate. Speaker de Venecia supported Cha-cha because he believes that a shift to a parliamentary form of government would benefit his own desire to become a prime minister.

    “The new attempt is conspicuously JDV-less, however. The stress now is on federalism, a message that, perhaps in addition to the alleged passing of envelopes and bags containing ‘Christmas gifts,’ clearly pleases the local allies of the President,” she added.

    She said that a JDV-less Cha-cha is unlikely to survive. “The administration would need his support if they truly want to succeed.”

    It is nothing but a spinoff of the proxy war between the President and JDV, she thinks. “It is not a call for genuine federalism, which should lead to empowerment from below. GMA’s Cha-cha is meant to consolidate the support of the President’s local allies to respond to a threat that emanates from JDV. She is using federalism as political insurance against JDV and to get the support of local politicians. We will oppose it.”

    The United Opposition (UNO) said, on the other hand, that Cha-cha may not be a diversionary tactic but the real agenda behind the reported payoffs made to lawmakers and local officials in Malacañang last week.

    “Given the high-profile controversies, the overwhelming negative sentiment of the people toward her administration, and the very real prospect of criminal charges after the 2010 election, the push for Cha-cha is a final, desperate gambit to stay in power forever,” said UNO president and Makati Mayor Jejomar Binay.

    Binay said the presidential gambit placed the raging controversy over the reported distribution of “cash donations” to congressmen and local officials in proper perspective.

    He added, “With Mrs. Arroyo giving her marching orders, we can expect the same cast of characters behind the fake People’s Initiative and the Constituent Assembly to be more visible in the coming days.”

    OTHER STORIES

    Exports to pull down GDP


    Cabinet lists measures vs economic threats


    DOF rejects option to stop borrowing in US dollars in ’08


    Back to basics, per CPBD: Hike tax collections


    RP still ranks low as FDI host


    DOE poseurs harassing LPG refill stations


    Belgian-led group wins Calaca bid


    CBCP: a bribe pure and simple


    ‘Federalism’ revival bid OK, but . . .


    Defying CA on Burgos, Esperon runs to SC