HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS MOTORING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
    RP still ranks low as FDI host
     
    By Cai U. Ordinario
    Correspondent

    THE country continues to be among the world’s poorest foreign direct investment (FDI) performers, according to the World Investment Report 2006 recently released by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (Unctad).

    The report showed that the country’s ranking in the Inward FDI Performance Index has been slipping. In 2004 the country was ranked 103rd, but in 2005 it was ranked 115th. The Philippines’ rankings in recent years have been very low compared with its 28th-place ranking in 1990.

    In terms of the Inward FDI Potential Index, the country’s ranking also continued to decline from the 60th place in 2003 to the 61st place in 2004. The Unctad did not include yet data on the 2005 rankings for all 141 economies.

    The Philippines was included in the list of countries considered performing below potential in FDI performance but with high FDI potential. The list includes Algeria, Argentina, Austria, Belarus, Brazil, Canada, Denmark, France, Germany, Greece, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Israel, Italy, Japan, Kuwait, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Mexico, Norway, Oman, Republic of Korea, Russian Federation, Saudi Arabia, Switzerland, Taiwan Province of China, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Ukraine, the United Kingdom and the United States.

    The report showed that FDI inflows into the country fell under the range of $1.0 billion to 9.9 billion, and around $0.1 billion to 0.9 billion-worth of FDI outflows.

    The Unctad said the top performer in the FDI index was Azerbaijan due to large investments in its oil and gas industry. The other countries who made the top five FDI performers were Brunei Darussalam, Hong Kong-China, Estonia and Singapore.

    “Among the top 20 performers by the index, 12 were developing economies and three were from the transition economies of Southeast Europe and the CIS [Commonwealth of Independent States]. Many high performers are oil- and gas-producing economies,” Unctad said.

    In the South, East and Southeast Asia and Oceania regions, FDI inflows reached a new high of $165 billion in 2005. The region is becoming increasingly attractive to market-seeking FDI. Furthermore, the report stated, transnational corporations’ (TNC) investments in financial services and high-tech industries are growing rapidly.

    However, FDI outflows from the region declined to $68 billion in 2005. The report said this was due to the decline in outward investments from some Asian newly industrializing economies (NIEs). But outflows from China increased sharply and helped change the pattern of outward FDI in the region.

    “China, Hong Kong [China] and Singapore retained their positions as the largest recipients of FDI in the region, while China emerged as a major outward investor,” Unctad said.

    China was in a class of its own in terms of FDI inflows which amounted to $50 billion, but it joins other Southeast Asian countries in the range of $10 billion to $49 billion worth FDI outflows.

    The report also cited several major investments of transnational companies originating from developing countries in the region. These include the acquisition of Wind Telecominicazioni of Italy worth $12.8 billion by the Weather Investment of Egypt, the acquisition of the PC section of IBM by China’s Lenovo through its Hong Kong affiliate for $1.8 billion, and San Miguel Corp’s acquisition of Australia-based National Foods Ltd. for $1.5 billion.

    This placed San Miguel in the 97th rank in the list of cross-border M&A deals with values of over $1 billion completed in 2005. There were 141 deals listed.

    “More than 90 percent of FDI inflows into developed countries originated in other developed countries. But in terms of stock, investments from developing countries in developed countries have been on the rise over the past decade, and their share in 2004 surpassed the level reached in 1990,” the report stated.

    Apart from a few larger contract manufacturers, the vast majority of investments are relatively small companies or less well-known, as they may be a part of larger groups. These include DA Corp. (electronic components, Republic of Korea), HTC27 (mobile phones, Taiwan Province of China), and Ayala-owned Integrated Microelectronics Inc.

    The Unctad said major outward FDI from developing and transition economies are important sources of FDI in agriculture, accounting in 2004 for 17 percent of the world total. Investments in mining, quarrying and petroleum remain at a low level from a global perspective.

    However, this situation seems to be changing as a result of the increased demand for natural resources by companies in such economies as China, India and the Russian Federation.

    In manufacturing, developing and transition economies have made inroads into such industries as electrical and electronic equipment (with a 7.8-percent share of global outward FDI stock in this industry in 2004), nonmetallic mineral products ( 4.3 percent) and rubber and plastic products (3.7 percent).

    In services, the shares of developing and transition economies in the global outward FDI stock are particularly high in trade (15 percent), business activities (14 percent), construction (12 percent), hotels and restaurants (9 percent), and transport, storage and communications (8 percent).

    Meanwhile, the survey also included Unctad’s survey of changes in national FDI policies suggests that countries in South, East and South-east Asia continue to open up their economies to inward FDI.

    Significant steps in this direction were taken in 2005, particularly in services. Unctad said several countries also streamlined administrative procedures and introduced new incentives to encourage more investment.

    A few measures also aimed at securing greater benefits from FDI, or addressing concerns over crossborder mergers and acquisitions. In terms of policies on outward FDI, some governments in the region continued to remove barriers or to strengthen support to the international expansion of domestic firms.

    Most of the changes in 2005 made conditions more favorable for foreign companies to enter and operate. The types of measures most frequently adopted were related to sectoral and cross-sectoral liberalization (57 policy changes), promotional efforts (51 policy changes), operational measures (22 policy changes) and FDI admission (19 policy changes).

    Rate reductions were most significant in Europe, where especially the new EU members continued to revise their corporate tax laws.

    However, tax increases have been the exception, and were only seen in the Dominican Republic which increased tax rates to 30 percent from 25 percent; Equatorial Guinea, 35 percent from 25 percent; Lithuania, to 19 percent from 15 percent; and the Philippines to 35 percent from 32 percent.

    Unctad said that in the context of FDI and development, there are important interactions between corporate strategies and public policies at the national and international levels.

    “The rise of FDI from developing and transition economies is no exception. Proactive government policies can help countries—be they sources or recipients of such investment—to benefit from such investment activity,” the report stated.

    By providing the appropriate legal and institutional environment, the report stated that home-country governments can create conditions that could induce their firms to invest overseas in ways that could benefit the home economy.

    Host-country policies, the Unctad said, can also affect the volume and net impact of inward FDI from developing and transition economies.

    The emergence of TNCs from these economies as key regional or global players in their industries is paralleled by important changes in policies governing FDI and related matters.

    OTHER STORIES

    Exports to pull down GDP


    Cabinet lists measures vs economic threats


    DOF rejects option to stop borrowing in US dollars in ’08


    Back to basics, per CPBD: Hike tax collections


    RP still ranks low as FDI host


    DOE poseurs harassing LPG refill stations


    Belgian-led group wins Calaca bid


    CBCP: a bribe pure and simple


    ‘Federalism’ revival bid OK, but . . .


    Defying CA on Burgos, Esperon runs to SC