|
Pressure
is mounting on Hong Kong to adopt a minimum wage, with
the city’s laissez-faire approach toward labor markets
coming in for increasing criticism.
“The
Olympics that exemplifies fair play is a perfect
backdrop for the Hong Kong government to set in motion
the long-overdue process of legislating a minimum wage,”
said an editorial last week in the China Securities
Journal, an affiliate of Xinhua, the Chinese state-owned
news agency.
“When we
take time to reflect on this galling social issue in the
spirit of the Olympics, even the most hard-nosed of
Scrooges among us should feel a tinge of embarrassment
that a large portion of our fellow citizens are shut out
from sharing the benefits of Hong Kong’s economic
prosperity that is the source of our pride,” the
editorial said.
The
premise of the argument is flawed.
Minimum
wages mustn’t be conflated with “fair play.”
The
absence of a state-mandated distortion in the labor
market of Hong Kong, a special administrative region of
China since 1997, doesn’t make employment contracts in
the city unjust.
There’s
no reason anyone in China should feel a “tinge of
embarrassment” about the city’s refusal to keep people
unemployed in the guise of getting them decent wages.
As
economist Milton Friedman used to say, minimum-wage
mandates—such as those that have existed in the UK since
1909 and in the United States since 1938—are laws that
ask employers to discriminate against people who have
low skills.
Fierce
debate
A
now-defunct proposal to raise New York state’s minimum
wage to $8.25 an hour by 2011—from $7.15 now—would have
seen almost 60 percent of the benefits accrue to
households with income at least twice the poverty line,
concluded a study last month by University of Georgia
economist Joseph Sabia and Cornell University economist
Richard Burkhauser.
For
every poor worker that would have benefited from a
higher minimum wage, others would have lost their jobs.
“Adverse
employment effects will undermine the collective income
gains,” the researchers said.
Why
should Hong Kong, whose 7 million people are among the
most prosperous in Asia, with an average per capita
income of $29,000 a year, go down this road?
Housekeepers, drawn mostly from the Philippines,
Thailand and Indonesia, now are the only segment of Hong
Kong’s labor force that has a prescribed minimum wage.
Employee
unions in Hong Kong want something similar for domestic
workers, of which 86 percent are employed in service
industries. Some members of the Legislative Council
support their cause. Employers are vehemently opposed.
‘Carefully balance’
Widening
income inequality may force the government’s hand and
compel it to mandate a minimum wage.
Poverty
has replaced unemployment as the top concern of voters
for the first time, says a new survey by the Hong Kong
Transition Project, which has found that a rising wealth
gap is now a serious concern.
It’s
serious enough to have already prompted the Hong Kong
government to put labor rights on top of its work
agenda. Of late, it has encouraged employers to join a
Wage Protection Movement. The idea is to nudge employers
to voluntarily agree to pay about HK$5,300 ($678) to
cleaners and a minimum of HK$6,600 to security guards
for eight hours of work, 26 days a month.
If a
review of the program in October 2008 shows it to be
unsatisfactory, Donald Tsang, the chief executive of
Hong Kong, may have no choice except to ordain a minimum
wage.
The
International Monetary Fund (IMF) has asked Hong Kong to
“carefully balance” labor-market flexibility with wage
protection, and, if possible, consider alternative
mechanisms.
The IMF
is quite correct. Hong Kong runs a rule-based monetary
system which pegs the local currency to the US dollar.
Ideas
and ideals
That
places “much of the burden of economic adjustment on the
flexibility of nominal wages and other prices,” the IMF
said in last year’s so-called Article IV consultation
report.
It isn’t
so much that Hong Kong will suddenly face a flight of
capital if it mandates a minimum wage for local workers,
and, in the process, end up losing its No. 1 rank on
Heritage Foundation’s global index of economic freedom—a
position it has held for 14 straight years.
This
battle isn’t about rankings.
It’s
about ideas and ideals.
Capitulation to one illiberal proposal will invariably
lead to accommodation of other, more deleterious ones.
Abdication of one dearly held principle will be followed
by a weakening of the entire suite of free-market
standards.
It’s
important for Tsang to stand up strongly against the
fake humanism of a state-mandated minimum wage: That way
lies not only folly, but disaster. |