|
Fresh
from its market-defining return on equity (ROE) of 26.6
percent, Security Bank Corp. (SBC) has increased its
chances of further improving on its financials with the
grant from the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) of a
license for it to deal in derivatives. With that
license, given only after a thorough scrutiny of its
financial strength, SBC can now offer companies a
trading window for them to limit their risks via
derivatives, an exotic financial product used as a
hedging facility.
SBC is
the first local bank to be granted the derivatives
license for Type 2 products that include FX (foreign
exchange) forwards, forward-rate agreements and options
on bonds, currencies, interest rates and combinations
thereof. This financial-product offering for the bank
would allow it to increase its trading income, since
export firms can now go through the bank for their
protection on wild swings in the peso-dollar rate, for
instance, or in insulating them from gyrations in
interest rate.
FX
forwards, as a derivative product, allow an export firm
to be assured of a predetermined peso-dollar rate at,
say, a year from now, effectively insulating it from
volatility in the exchange rate. When such a company
purchases an FX forward via SBC at the strike price of,
say, a peso-dollar rate of P47 to $1, on August 27,
2009, when the peso strengthens by that time to P42 to
$1, it can still get payment by that transaction price
of P47 to $1 because of the FX forwards done through
Security Bank.
This
product offering from SBC would give ample elbow room
for export firms to protect their costs and their
profits since they are hedged against such wild
fluctuations in the exchange rate. With it, they will be
able to continue their operations without the risks of
currency volatility. Without the derivatives products,
export firms will not be hedged against the kind of
volatility that saw the peso-dollar rate strengthen from
P56 to P40 that resulted in many company closures.
Aside
from hedging on currency rates, SBC’s license allows it
to also offer derivatives on forward-rate agreements,
essentially a mechanism to allow a firm to be insulated
from risks arising from gyrations in interest rate. With
these offerings, SBC can now be said to be hedged from
its top pole position as the No.1 bank in terms of ROE,
the financial yardstick by which the world’s No.1
billionaire Warren Buffett subjects firms that he
intends to fold in into Berkshire Hathaway, a
conglomerate that made its money purely on trading
income, not in operating a business enterprise.
The
award by BSP of the Type 2 dealership to Security Bank
enhances the bank’s suite of product offerings. Where
before it could only offer a limited product lineup as a
Type 1 dealer, now it could also offer other exotic
financial instruments to enhance its trading income.
This, while helping husband the resources and business
models of local companies that can now hedge the risks
inherent in their business operations, such as
yen-dollar exchange-rate swings.
That
means an exponential surge in Security Bank’s income, as
companies that transact with the bank for their hedging
facilities would now have to open checking accounts.
These checking accounts would give the bank access to
zero or almost-zero costs in deposits that they can then
harness for their loans that assure the bank at least
9.75 percent in interest rate for prime clients, like
San Miguel Corp.
Pre-audit of projects
Former
Budget commissioner Silvestre Sarmiento has a solution
to the government’s woes on losses arising from its
projects. Many a time, there are big-ticket
infrastructure projects where losses, wastage and even
fraud have been detected. Unfortunately, by the time the
findings on fraud are out, the government can no longer
go after those responsible for the government losses.
Sarmiento said the Commission on Audit (COA), as
“watchdog of the Treasury,” is mandated to audit and
settle accounts, to ferret out fiscal anomalies,
identify violators and initiate charges and safeguard
government funds and property. To achieve these, the COA
gives primacy to postaudit. However, it is this
post-audit policy thrust that results in the government
losses.
COA
postaudit has failed to deter irregularities. In fact,
fiscal anomalies seem to have increased in number due to
contract flaws and lapses in fiscal management.
Perpetrators brave risks of discovery and penalties when
thinking of the munificent spoils of malfeasance. With
postaudit, government transactions may be disallowed,
but then services were already rendered, supplies and
equipment delivered and payments made. Thus, fund
recovery suffers because time-lapse officers involved
may no longer be in the service.
Sarmiento, now in his 80s, cited World Bank studies that
confirm there is less fraud in government operations
where there is effective internal control, proper
contract review, compliance with audit requirements and
uncompromising commitment of top management. Thus, for
him, there is a need to come up with a pre-audit scheme
to lessen the incidence of fraud in government
infrastructure projects.
To
achieve this, Sarmiento believes COA auditors should
undertake special pre-audit and focus on special
programs, projects or contracts with time-phased
appropriations. With the aid of legal officers, they
also should review contract clauses to determine
specific requirements for each contract to be used in
determining allowability, allocability and
reasonableness of costs billed to the government. In
this way, the government can be insulated from the fraud
risks instigated by unscrupulous government men.
E-mail: hugagni@yahoo.com |