HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • US crisis’  impact on Asia ‘severe’
     
    By Dennis D. Estopace
    Reporter
     

    ASIA’S cheap labor advantage is now a liability.

                    The United States is going to retrieve the businesses it outsourced because it is more cost-effective that way with the high cost of transporting goods, journalist-turned-research fellow Tion Kwa said.

                    Kwa, a 2008 Bernard Schwartz Fellow, said the ramifications to Asia of a “technical” recession in the US are severe because the dollar remains weak despite actions by American monetary authorities.

                    Kwa, a former editor of Singapore’s Straits Times newspaper, added that the weakening dollar has pushed up oil prices.

                    “Asia has so little in place in conserving oil because it’s a basic ingredient in its economy while the US still has reserves and has been moving for conservation; something that the European countries have already done. The EU has reached its level of efficiently conserving oil.”

                    Hence, Kwa said, Asians will continue to depend on oil despite its price “probably not declining to the level we’re comfortable with.”

                    This, however, has made transporting goods cheaper intra-US states and even from Mexico.

                    “Thus, even if Asia trades on low labor cost, it wouldn’t matter as goods moved on transoceanic level would remain expensive.”

                    To illustrate, he noted that a decade ago a 40-foot container shipped to the US cost a shipper $600, against $8,000 today.

                    The charges to tariff, though constant, were superseded by a 9-percent increase in the cost of shipping. “Effectively, that erases all gains of tariff reductions enjoyed by the US.”

                    Kwa added that steel, for example, cost $90 a ton to ship to the US for 1.5 hours of labor required to produce that commodity.

                    “The high costs erode whatever gains [there are] from cheap labor. In the long run, it would be cheaper to produce steel in Pittsburgh for use in New York,” Kwa said.

                    Because most Asian countries have relied heavily on cheap labor as a trade advantage, Kwa said the adjustments would take long.

                    He proposes two long-term remedies. One is to build stronger domestic consumption; another is to produce  higher-value goods.

                    The Philippines, he said, should focus, for example, on its rice production and not replicate the panic-buying and panic-hoarding that Kwa said the country started.

                    He added the Philippines should look closer into the business-process outsourcing industry as he predicts the continuing weakening of the dollar may force US companies to ensure some processes remain within American territories.

    OTHER STORIES

    SC upholds cigarette tax law


    US crisis’  impact on Asia ‘severe’


    Devt partners make ‘to-do’ list for Congress


    Foreign chambers, local biz shrug off impact of ‘war’


    Govt rhetoric on deal puzzling


    Muslim civilians gave priests shelter


    RP makes a splash thru satellite


    State audit of Meralco books ‘legally shaky’


    Outlying rural banks to have ATMs too


    Solons push oil dereg’n law’s repeal


    Vasquez kin employment papers sought