HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  
     
    A peace that could lead to war

     

    IN its alarming provisions for an enlarged Moro homeland and the way it was negotiated in the dark, the memorandum of agreement on ancestral domain between the GRP (Government Republic of the Philippines and the MILF (Moro Islamic Liberation Front) deserves to die in the water.

    It has raised alarms and anger throughout the country that will not be assuaged by assurances that the memorandum of agreement (MOA) is just “a piece of paper.” There is no way forward for the vision of a Bangsamoro Juridical Entity, whatever the euphemistic construction means.

    It is one measure of the MOA’s infirmity that Mindanao and Sulu have now exploded into sporadic encounters between MILF bands and government forces.  It is another sign of weakness that nobody, except the negotiators, bothers anymore to defend it. Most significant, as the GRP-MILF deal remains suspended by the Supreme Court’s temporary restraining order, elections have proceeded in the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao (ARMM) and, by all accounts, they have been successful, with voters going to the polls and computerized balloting functioning fairly well.

    There are those of us who frankly do not understand why our government should be negotiating another deal over a Muslim homeland when there is already one in place: the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao. Was ARMM a deal solely for the Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF) and Nur Misuari? Must we now forge a separate peace with the MILF because they are actively in rebellion? What happens if another rebel bunch, say, the Abu Sayyaf, also proclaims its desire for its own peace deal? Where does the policy of appeasement of secessionists stop?

    RP archipelago’s coherence

    This latest peace initiative of the government has fallen flat because it has forgotten one very basic fact: the essential unity and coherence of the Philippine archipelago, which flies against any scheme to subdivide or dismember it.

    When you look at the map of the country, the islands and islets from Batanes to Tawi-Tawi, while diverse, cohere into a natural whole. There are no islands that can in any way be construed as being part of another nearby country, like Taiwan, or Malaysia or Indonesia. They have been an entity since the 16th century as the Philippine Islands. You separate one island from the whole, and you will have immediately a quarrel with the rest.

    The notion, therefore, of a separate state for Muslim Filipinos—whatever may be the status of their armed rebellion against the Philippine State—is a no-no. Autonomy is the most that can be allowed or, if you wish, federalism. ARMM was a start in this direction, but Nur Misuari, after five years at the helm, took up arms again. Even so, that did not kill Muslim autonomy. It continues, albeit with attendant problems and questions about whether it’s really working.

    For government negotiators to foist the new terms “ancestral domain” and “Bangsamoro Juridical Entity” on the nation, in the belief that they will bring peace at last to Mindanao and Sulu, is the height of self-delusion. They only leave many Filipinos angry as to why our government should be so craven as to concede this. The hard reality is that there is no force that the MILF can mount—and no area that it can hold—against the determined power of our Armed Forces. During the time of President Joseph Estrada, when the AFP pursued all-out war against the MILF, the citadels of Hashim Salamat were destroyed. But the preferred solution is still by way of peace negotiations—although that does not mean peace at any price.

    At the end of the day, the essential unity and coherence of the Philippine archipelago—more than the claims of individual families to their lands—is what will frustrate anyone who tries to sever one part from the rest of the country. To preserve the whole, the entire nation will take up arms. No peace negotiator and no outside mediator should forget that.

    Secessionist tide

    In a world where many secessionist movements have succeeded in establishing their own republics, this assertion of Philippine territorial integrity might seem problematic.

    In the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia, we see many instances of people successfully creating their own nations from the fragmentation and disintegration of the old entities. In the wake of the collapse of the USSR, we can hardly keep track of the new republics that have emerged—Ukraine, Estonia, Lithuania, Georgia, Uzbekistan and so on. In Yugoslavia many have been the wars fought to give birth to the new countries we see today—Serbia, Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Kosovo, etc. Closer to home, we have seen East Timor break away from the bosom of Indonesia.   

    The temptation to see the secessionist demands of the MILF in much the same light is the reason there seems to be no lack of countries trying to help negotiate and witness a peace deal between Muslim rebels and our government. This is why Ambassadors Kristie Kinney of the United States, Makoto Katsura of Japan, Roderick Smith of Australia and Sayed Elm Masry of the Organization of the Islamic Conference were at the ready to witness the signing of the MOA in Kuala Lumpur. They thought this thing is only natural for the resolution of a secessionist struggle that has been going on for generations.

    But there is a crucial difference here. The breakaway of nationalities from the former Soviet Union and Yugoslavia was rooted in their historic and separate identities. They were nations before Josef Stalin and Marshal Tito brought them into their communist embrace. East Timor was separate before Indonesia annexed it.

    The MILF cannot lay claim to such a separate ethnic or historic identity. And the Philippine state is in no way disintegrating. The MILF can no more claim to being the voice of Muslim Filipinos any more than ARMM and other Muslim groups which are already integrated into the national community. Most do not believe in a state separate from the Republic of the Philippines, let alone one led by the MILF.

    If against these hard realities, government negotiators persist in foisting the MOA on the nation, they will be serving not the path of peace but a recipe for civil war in Mindanao. And that’s a prospect infinitely more frightening than the headache we’re trying to solve today.

    OTHER STORIES

    Editorial: Roads to prosperity

    The Chinese have a saying: If you want to get rich, build a road. Following Deng Xiaoping’s launch of the Four Modernizations Program in 1978, the People’s Republic did just that.

    read more

    Nonnie L. Pelayo: CA mess: Whose fault?

    THE unsavory reputation of the Court of Appeals owing to the misbehaving members in its ranks is traceable to the nonobservance by the Judicial and Bar Council (JBC) of its own rules and the culture of accommodation among its members when these errant justices were nominated.

    read more

    Dispatches from the Enchanted Kingdom: Just a piece of paper?

    ‘It’s just a piece of paper. There’s nothing to worry about,” replied Fr. Joaquin Bernas when asked by the Philippine Daily Inquirer about the memorandum of agreement (MOA) between the Arroyo administration and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF).  

    read more

    The Way Forward: A peace that could lead to war

    IN its alarming provisions for an enlarged Moro homeland and the way it was negotiated in the dark, the memorandum of agreement on ancestral domain between the GRP (Government Republic of the Philippines and the MILF (Moro Islamic Liberation Front) deserves to die in the water.

    read more

    Market Files: Bangko Sentral disclosure

    The disclosure by the Bangko Sentral Pilipinas (BSP) of the banking industry’s P89-billion exposure to the collapsing collateralized debt obligations (CDOs) in the subprime market in the United States is commendable.

    read more

    Philip M. Lustre Jr.: Responsible mining is a myth

    As mining activities take an upswing, bigger environmental woes loom, offsetting gains that have been made by the mining sector. The heavy social cost of a mining boom is to be expected. Mining growth and environmental degradation, or “ecological terrorism,” as an observer aptly puts it, are two sides of the same coin; one side goes with the other side.

    read more

    Inter Press Service: WTO talks collapse and the birth of a new world order

    OSLO—There is a clear lesson to be drawn from the unsuccessful World Trade Organization (WTO) negotiations held in Geneva from July 21 to 29: The world is witnessing a shift of power in the arena of the world economy and world trade. New states with growing economies and political ambitions are asserting themselves.

    read more