|
After
the accusatory din against the Government Service
Insurance System (GSIS) regarding a supposed raiding of
the funds for members so the Office of the President
kuno can get P1 billion by way of dividends has died
down, what is emerging is an aberrant obfuscation of
facts to make it appear that the GSIS was remiss in its
mandate to safeguard the funds that should accrue to
government employees.
One only
needs to appreciate fully whence the funds came to know
that the complaint before the Ombudsman filed against
GSIS top honcho Winston Garcia does not have the best of
motives.
For the
complaint that one Albert Velasco filed against Garcia
seemed to proceed from an invalid premise: that the
dividends that were given to the government coffers (not
to the Office of the President, as claimed in the suit)
came from the fund meant only for the government
employees’ benefits. This fund, identified as the GSIS
Social Insurance Fund (SIF), was never touched, as is
being claimed. What the GSIS did was to dip from the
so-called GSIS General Insurance Fund (GIF), which is a
different animal altogether.
The GIF
is different from that of the SIF, the former being the
fund from where the earnings of the GSIS arising from
its business of insuring government-owned and
-controlled assets are lodged, the latter being the
money vault for the government workers’ contributions.
Whatever earnings the GSIS makes from the GIF,
especially since not all the assets so insured go up in
smoke or are hit by calamities, are mandated to be
remitted to the government coffers by way of the
National Treasury.
Had the
GSIS dipped its finger into the SIF, then the complaint
could be deemed valid for the pension fund is not
supposed to get from the SIF and lump the same as
dividends for the government. This simply cannot be done
as there are rules that govern trust-fund operations.
Any infraction of the rules cannot escape the eagle eyes
of the Commission on Audit.
GSIS
chief legal counsel Estrella Elamparo, in explaining the
facts of the case, has left no room for doubt as to the
validity of the dividend payout that the pension fund
remitted to the government in December 2004. The GSIS
official even cited a dividend declaration of the
pension fund from the members’ fund or SIF. “As a matter
of fact, GSIS members also received dividends of their
own, totaling P847 million in December of 2004, which
came from the GSIS SIF,” Ms. Elamparo said.
“The P1
billion that went to the national coffers came from the
GSIS GIF, the P847 million that went to GSIS members
came from the GSIS SIF. This should be illustrative
enough of the senselessness of the claim that the GSIS
raided the funds due GSIS members so it can give P1
billion to the government,” she said. There, now, the
colorful language of Ms. Elamparo belies the colored
filing of the suit before the Ombudsman and put in its
distinct place the GIF from that of the SIF.
On this
score, the dividend payments, which we recall were meant
to bolster the government’s coffers, can stand legal
scrutiny. Aside from the GSIS, other government
financial institutions also chipped in to the government
by way of dividends, including those of the Development
Bank of the Philippines and the Land Bank of the
Philippines. And the dividends all came from the
earnings from the operations of these government
financial institutions.
Holcim
launches new product
Holcim
Philippines Inc., a cement firm which is into
ecology-friendly production operations, launched last
night its new product, WallRight, at the Crowne Pointe
Hotel in the Ortigas Business District.
The new
product is a masonry cement which the company said is
ideal for “plastering, hollow-block laying and finishing
applications. “What is remarkable about the product is
that it has a bond strength of 200 percent compared with
general-purpose
cement.
With the
present challenges arising from the subprime mess, the
oil-price spike and the global inflationary spiral,
companies are now coming up with new products and ideas
to increase their revenues by way of high-end products.
This is part of a new marketing mantra that says
different products should be made to cater to different
classes of people. In so doing, a company would be able
to survive the current difficult times.
Holcim
chief operating officer Ian Thackwray earlier revealed
that the company has entered into long-term supply
agreements with its clients, such as construction firms
and developers, so that a set price would subsist for,
say, one year, even if there are spikes in the costs of
raw materials or inputs such as energy costs. This
innovative move shows the management savvy of Thackwray,
who was into chemicals before joining the company.
Indeed,
one needs an outsider looking in to be able to come up
with a different perspective on the business despite of
the challenging economic environment. By getting the
long-term contracts, Holcim would be able to create
efficiencies in its production such that it could afford
to concentrate on the launch of other cement products.
Why, the company is now marketing concrete roof, proof
that it is well-ensconced at the top of the industry.
E-mail:
hugagni@yahoo.com |