|
LAKAS
Rep. Jocelyn Limkaichong of Negros Oriental has asked
the Supreme Court (SC) to set for oral argument the
consolidated cases filed before it questioning her
election as a member of Congress.
In a
six-page motion, Limkaichong, through her lawyer Pete
Quirino-Quadra, stressed that the oral argument is also
necessary in order to settle the issues on jurisdiction
and constitutionality which she raised in her petition.
“We
respectfully pray that the… cases be set for oral
argument on the …jurisdictional and constitutional
questions that we have raised,” Limkaichong said.
In her
petition, Limakaichong also asked the Court to nullify
the resolution issued by the Commission on Elections (Comelec)
disqualifying her as a congressional candidate for the
province’s First District in the May 14, 2007 elections
on the ground that she is not a natural-born Filipino
citizen.
Limkaichong insisted that she is a natural-born Filipino
citizen because, at the time of her birth on November 9,
1959, her father Julio Sy was already a naturalized
Filipino citizen.
The
Comelec’s Second Division ruled on May 17, 2007, to
disqualify Limkaichong, saying that her father failed to
acquire Filipino citizenship through naturalization
proceedings before a court.
Limkaichong won by a majority of 7,746 votes over her
next rival Olivia Paras, and less than 40,000 votes over
the third placer, former congressman Jerome Paras.
Of the
consolidated four cases in the Court, one was filed by
Limkaichong, while the others were initiated by Louis
Biraogo, Renald Villando and Olivia Paras, who ran
against her in the May 14, 2007 elections.
In
particular, Limkaichong assailed as unconstitutional the
contention of her rivals that the June 29, 2007, Comelec
en banc resolution affirming the May 17, 2007,
resolution of the Comelec Second Division disqualifying
her is allegedly final and executory because she did not
file a petition for certiorari within five days from the
promulgation of the June 29, 2007, Comelec en banc
resolution.
She
cited Section 7, Article 9 of the Constitution and
Section 2, Rule 64 of the Rules of Court, which provides
that “Any decision, order, or ruling of its Commissions
may be brought to the Supreme Court on certiorari by the
aggrieved party within thirty days [30] from receipt of
a copy thereof.”
In this
case, Limkaichong received the Comelec en banc
resolution dated June 29, 2007 on July 3, 2007. The
petition for certiorari was filed before the SC on
August 1, 2007, within the reglementary period of 30
days.
She said
that since the petition was filed within the required
period, there is no reason for the Court not to rule on
the jurisdictional issues that she has raised.
Limkaichong also urged the SC to resolve the conflicting
decisions of the Comelec involving her candidacy and
proclamation as the duly elected representative of the
First District of Negros Oriental.
Limkaichong was referring to the May 17, 2007,
resolution of the Comelec Second Division and the evenly
divided June 29, 2007, Comelec en banc resolution
affirming the said May 17, 2007 resolution disqualifying
her from being a congressional candidate.
A day
after the May 17, 2007, resolution was issued, the
Comelec en banc promulgated Resolution 8062, providing
that there shall be no “suspension of proclamation of
winning candidates with pending disqualification
cases…without prejudice to the continuation of the
hearing and resolution of the involved cases”
Despite
the Comelec resolution, Villando and Paras questioned
the proclamation of Limkaichong.
In her
memorandum submitted to the SC, Limkaichong stressed
that her father filed his petition for naturalization on
July 28, 1955, when he was still single, at the age of
22, with the Court of First Instance of Negros Oriental,
Branch 2. On May 27, 1956, Julio Sy married Anecia Uy
Guangco-Dy, a natural-born Filipino citizen.
After
the hearing of July 10, 1959, the Court of First
Instance on September 21, 1959, issued the order
declaring Julio Ong Sy a naturalized Filipino citizen.
On October 21, 1959, Julio Ong Sy took his oath of
allegiance and was issued the Certificate of
Naturalization.
She
maintained that the citizenship of his father cannot be
“collaterally attacked” in a disqualification case
considering the SC had earlier held that the procedure
to declare null and void the grant of citizenship
through naturalization pursuant to final judgments of
competent courts and after the oaths of allegiance had
been taken and the certificates of naturalization is by
cancellation of naturalization certificate.
She
pointed out that up to the present, the Solicitor
General has not filed any petition seeking the
cancellation of his father’s naturalization certificate. |