|
In
response to the food crisis gripping the world today,
the International Food Policy Research Institute has
recommended contract farming to help small farmers of
the developing world produce and sell more crops.
Contract
farming provides a system where multinational food
corporations or exporting units purchase harvests of
independent farmers in advance, the terms of which are
stated in a contract.
Ardent
advocates of this setup, such as the Harvard Business
School, argue that contract farming is a revolutionary
means of integrating small farmers into the
international food market because it provides them
market access with minimal risk.
Contract
farming also facilitates technology transfer, as
multinational corporations require farmers to meet
international standards. For crops to pass their
qualifications, private contractors often provide the
necessary inputs, fertilizer and infrastructure.
In
India, for instance, higher yields and assured prices
from contract farming has tripled gross returns in
wheat, paddy and potato compared with those grown in
noncontract-farming systems.
In
Mindanao, technology transfer through contract farming
eventually empowered farmers to graduate from contract
growing to marketing their own products.
In 2002,
the Federation of Agrarian Reform Cooperatives
established through a joint venture with Japan-based
Alter Trade the Mindanao Organic Ventures Enterprise,
which directly exports bananas to Japan. Currently, the
Philippines is the third-largest exporter of Cavendish
banana, next only to Ecuador and Costa Rica, and has the
largest yield per hectare in the world.
Contract
farming, however, is not immune from dangers and abuses,
especially from the side of private contractors.
In many
cases, production techniques transferred to farmers are
highly crop-specific; hence, it does not only deter crop
diversification, but poses threats to long-term
sustainability, as well.
Naturally, contractors would want to harvest from farms
as much as possible, which may lead them to encourage
the overuse of fertilizers and water to boost yield, but
with the heavy cost of soil degradation.
Manipulative contractors also do not specify who would
bear the burden in cases where extreme weather damages
crops, and the more enterprising ones maneuver quality
standards to get a portion of the crops at a lower
price.
This is
where the government role as regulator comes in. Not
only is it necessary that the rule of law and a
fair-contract regime are implemented, but that farmers
are educated in the terms they would be entering into.
Government-sponsored research and development could also
complement the technology transfer from contract farming
to make it sustainable and beneficial in uplifting
subsistence farming.
E-mail: edgardo_angara@hotmail.com. Web site:
www.edangara.com. |