|
IF I had
my way, I would choose the development of electric
vehicles over any other technologies that are being
introduced to combat the spiraling cost of oil these
days.
The
launch of the first batch of 14-seater e-jeepneys that
will service the Legaspi and Salcedo Villages in the
financial district of Makati is a giant step in the
promotion of vehicles that use new and viable energy
sources.
Since
many of our mass transport vehicles, especially buses,
jeepeneys and taxis, are encouraged by the government to
switch to alternative fuel, the electric vehicle fits
the bill.
No, it’s
not that I am against liquefied petroleum gas, or LPG.
Comparing the cost and environmental benefits of an
electric vehicle against an LPG-powered one will result
in the former beating the latter in all departments.
This is aside from the fact that almost 90 percent of
the e-jeepneys’ components are sourced locally.
Those e-jeepneys
are not slow as one might think. They run between 40 to
60 kph. Their batteries can be charged in six to eight
hours. It is reported that each charging, which only
costs around P158, lasts at least 90 kilometers. And
reports also have it that one charging is enough for an
e-jeepney to make about 10 to 15 round trips. Electric
vehicles also do not produce emissions that affect the
environment. Definitely, the promotion of other electric
mass transport (or even privately used) vehicles will be
greatly appreciated, especially in this time of crisis.
We
already have electric tricycles on some of our roads
after Palawan Mayor Edward Hagedorn and Makati Mayor
Jojo Binay supported their introduction several months
back.
In the
US, the most fuel-efficient cars are hybrids that use
both gasoline and batteries. Although hybrid cars are
very expensive, they’ve become an instant hit as
megabuck actors and political personalities flaunt them
as their way of helping in the greening of the
environment. The Toyota Prius currently leads the way
and is now considered as the most fuel-efficient car in
the world.
Two to
three years from now, a new generation of hybrid cars
will be fielded on all fronts by those car manufacturers
who have already invested heavily in the said
technology. Sooner of later, hybrid cars will no longer
use gasoline, and that will be the time when Henry
Ford’s immemorial T-model cars will be remembered once
again.
And that
will be the time when those greedy oil producers will
come to their senses, and we hope they would reflect for
a while and think about their sins on how they made the
world very poor and hungry.
****
AND in
this time of skyrocketing oil prices, even the rich are
feeling the pinch.
That’s
why the news that Emerald Joy Villaflor of PGA Cars
e-mailed to us recently about its all-new Audi A4 2.0TDI
that “ran 29 kilometers per liter of diesel” is a
welcome one. Here’s her story:
“Twenty
randomly selected readers of a motoring magazine and a
team of two from Audi fully exploited the efficiency
potential of the new Audi A4 2.0 TDI in order to drive
from Basel to Vienna and back on a single tank of fuel.
All 11 teams made it to the end and still had between 5
and 9 liters of diesel left over. After a total driving
time of 22 hours on average with an average speed of
between 74 and 81 km/h, the white Audi A4 cars reached
their destination.
“The new
2-liter TDI engine provides ideal conditions for
economical driving. With a combined consumption figure
of just 20 kilometers per liter and CO2 emissions of
only 134 grams per kilometer, the efficiency of the
sportiest midsize sedan is simply outstanding.
“However, participants in the Audi efficiency
competition significantly bettered even these impressive
combined consumption figures. The winning team needed
just 29 kilometers per liter. This equates to CO2
emissions of only 91 grams per kilometer—an outstanding
figure at an average speed of 81.4 kph. Four teams
achieved less than 29 kilometers per liter. But even the
Audi in 11th place recorded an impressive average fuel
consumption of 27 kilometers per liter.”
****
THERE
are several states in the US that have passed a law
prohibiting the use of hand-held cell phones while
driving. The law, however, allows the use of hands-free
devices while driving.
A US
study found that drivers using cell phones are four
times more likely to be in an accident. That study
suggested that limiting cell-phone usage to hands-free
devices doesn’t have much of an effect. In short, it’s
the distraction of talking on the cell phone that
affects the focus of a driver on the road.
Here,
the use of cell phones while driving goes on unabated.
Despite the various ordinances banning the practice,
many drivers can be seen doing it. |