|
Atty.
Ray C. Espinosa, ePLDT president and chief executive
officer, is in his zone leading the Philippine Long
Distance Telephone Co. subsidiary in pursuing growth in
the information and communications technology (ICT)
sector.
Espinosa, who simultaneously holds various positions in
the PLDT group, says decision-making should involve the
views of the management team. In running a business,
there is no room for dictatorship, he says. For
Espinosa, a democratic business atmosphere goes
hand-in-hand with inspirational leadership, where the
head recognizes the ability and competence of the junior
executives leading them toward professional growth.
“You
have to nurture these professionals and give them the
respect they deserve, which includes listening to them.
If their views are correct and mine is wrong, you have
to able to give it to them,” he says.
Espinosa, who topped the 1982 bar examinations, says
empowering managers, particularly those in the middle
levels, is good for personal development because they
can be made accountable and responsible for their duties
and areas. He also keeps an open-door policy to give
them guidance.
But when
it comes to crunch time, Espinosa takes charge.
Please
describe your entry into the telecom sector.
In 1998
when First Pacific was planning to invest in PLDT, they
hired lawyers and went to my firm Sycip Salazar
Hernandez and Gatmaitan. At that time, the managing
partner of the law firm of First Pacific knew me. Being
out of practice, he engaged me for First Pacific and we
closed the deal in November 1998. At that time, he first
made me a director of PLDT. After two years, they
decided to make an offer for an executive function in
the group.
I am
always on the business side of things because most of my
practice in Sycip was in business mergers and
acquisitions. So that side of the fence always attracted
me. When you look at it on the lawyer’s side, it’s
always fascinating to watch, especially big companies,
how they act, move and look at things.
Plus, of
course, I guess the more moving reason in deciding to
make the shift was to have a chance to work with MVP [PLDT
chairman Manuel V. Pangilinan]. We know him
professionally and his work ethic especially. In the
firm, I was one of the lawyers who worked the longest
hours with an average of 15 hours plus during the
weekends.
Doing
the shift in terms of his working style was not a
problem for me. In PLDT, I enjoy the work tempo because
it’s fast paced. I get bored when the pace is slow. I
work better when there’s more pressure.
Did it
require major adjustments upon moving to PLDT?
You had
to make an adjustment in terms of how you look at things
because you now have to look at things from the business
side, although when I was working with the firm, the
business lawyers of the firm looked more into the
business side rather than the legal side. That’s why we
were known for finding the right solutions to the legal
questions and transactions. We looked at legal issues
more from the business side and how to be able to allow
business do what they want to do within the legal
framework. In that sense, we have that perspective,
given our 17-year exposure to business issues.
So,
taking a look at the business side was not strange. But,
of course, you need a lot more than that. You have to
think the way they do. All the time you have to consider
that you are working for a larger organization.
When I
was in the law firm, I was one of the bosses. Here, you
have to be a team player. That is the strength of the
senior management in PLDT. They are all team players.
What is
the role of ePLDT in the group?
We’re a
smaller part of the group. Our focus is really on ICT.
We started as a data center service business in 2000.
And looking back, I think we started the business too
early in the sense that we were one of the pioneers and
there was not much demand yet locally for data center
services. Although looking back now and like a year ago,
you can see how big the demand is for these types of
services. In fact, our data centers are almost full and
we’ll probably be full by the end of the year. So we’re
looking at building a second data center by the end of
the year.
That’s
been ePLDT’s, I guess, history in the sense that we
started businesses. For a certain period of time, we
became the loss leaders of the group in the case of the
data centers. But we have been able to turn it around,
make it profitable and the demand of business for this
type of services has increased dramatically.
Then we
ventured into the Internet café business. There again,
we blazed the trail in the sense of owning a large
network of Internet cafés. But the strategy behind that
really then was, if people really knew, to essentially
move the growing Internet café industry from dial-up to
DSL [digital subscriber line]. When we launched Netopia,
we wanted to deploy DSL. And because we offered a better
quality than dial-up, very soon the other Internet cafés
followed. And so the Internet cafés today are now on
DSL. Whatever edge we had at the start we lost overtime.
That was just part of the strategy. There are around
12,000 to 13,000 Internet cafés nationwide. Although we
have 25 cafés of our own, that’s not enough for you to
control the industry. So, we just sort of blazed the
trail for DSL to be the preferred connectivity of the
cafés.
Are
there plans to expand the number of Internet cafés?
We will
expand them but it will be more strategic rather than
just growing the Internet cafés in terms of numbers. The
industry is huge, composed of big, medium and small
operators. We don’t want to impede the small
entrepreneurs. One is because it’s good to develop that
kind of spirit. Second, they also end up as customers of
PLDT. As the industry grows in terms of numbers,
especially numbers from other players, it benefits the
group in a larger way.
How is
ePLDT contributing to the growth of PLDT?
Well,
last year in terms of revenue we contributed 7 percent
of PLDT’s revenue. By 2009, we’ll probably be 9 percent
to 10 percent of PLDT’s revenue. We are trying to
increase our contribution to the profit of PLDT on a
consolidated basis. Hopefully this year, our profit
outlook will be better than last year. We have
encountered problems with our health-care unit. A number
of pricing, quality and delivery issues emerged. But
most of them were solved in the first quarter. So, we
expect the health-care unit to see signs of a turnaround
by the second half of the year. That’s the only one we
view significantly to impact our bottom line. Actually,
the medical transcription unit improves revenue-wise and
profit-wise, and then the profitability of ePLDT will be
felt more by PLDT. It’s increasing. But of course we
want the increase to be very palpable. We all want to be
meaningful contributors to the group.
Is there
a need to rush toward becoming a more relevant
contributor?
You need
to rush. When the group is moving very fast, you have to
keep pace with the group not in terms of business
expansion, revenue growth and profit growth. This year,
our subsidiary Infocom Technologies will be focusing on
the small medium enterprise segment offering them
communication solutions including obviously Internet
access. It complements the PLDT strategy of the SME
Nation. Infocom has a version of the SME Nation but not
as large scale as PLDT. It will concentrate on the SMEs,
which is the bulk of the business in the Philippines.
The solutions that you offer to the big corporations are
not the same needs of the SMEs. And they need the same
quality of service but at the price points to the size
of their businesses and the segment of the market they
cater to.
What
makes a Jesuit-trained lawyer different from the rest of
his colleagues?
I won’t
really compare the system of training in Ateneo, say,
with UP. They have to make a fine analysis of the
differences. But one thing I can say is the law program
in Ateneo is very relevant. It’s not simply bar-oriented
in the sense we will study the law to ensure the
graduates will eventually pass the bar. Passing the bar
is expected of you provided you study very well. So for
me, when you enter law school, obviously you want to
become a lawyer and you have to pass the bar. Having
said all of that, it begins by studying very well.
You have
to take your studies seriously. And you also have to
choose a law school that you believe has professors with
a wealth of experience and knowledge that makes them
well positioned to share with you the finest knowledge
and experience. So without disrespect to the other law
schools, a serious law student or would-be law student
must be conscious also of the strength of the law school
and its faculty. It improves obviously your chances of
passing the bar since that is the end resolve of your
studies.
But more
important—and because it is what you need to carry
through after passing the bar—your grasp of the law is
also very important. In law school, you will study the
basic principles of the various laws. And that is
something you have to take seriously. But what you
learned in law school amazingly is a lot different that
how you basically apply the law in the real world,
especially in business, and that comes with just
basically practice. |