|
ROME—With Barack
Obama likely to win the White House this November,
George W. Bush has become more of a lame duck than other
US presidents at the end of their terms. The unusually
high turnout in the primary elections demonstrated the
desire of the American populace to free itself from an
administration that is already considered the worst in
American history.
But if
we judge Bush objectively, that is to say, by the
results, I believe the moment has come for lovers of
peace and international cooperation to come together to
grant him the formal recognition he deserves as the US
president that has done the most to create a more just
and more democratic world in which the old thinking on
the military force and manifest destiny of the
superpower is in profound crisis.
The
first major contribution of Bush was to demonstrate that
unilateralism can no longer work in a world that is
increasingly multipolar. Predictions of the decline of
the United States are debatable, but what is certain is
the growing weight of countries like China, India and
Brazil. Bush’s policies have increased Washington’s
isolation, not its ability to lead. It is symbolic that
at the beginning of his first term, the United Nations
was in crisis and the Bretton Woods system (the World
Bank and International Monetary Fund) in a dominant
position. At the end of his second term the reverse is
true.
Another
important contribution by Bush is the definitive
refutation of the theory that war can resolve conflict.
The fact that the United States, which spends on arms as
much as the 14 next top weapons spenders, finds itself
bogged down with its allies in the two wars that it has
entered into—despite the fact that Vice President Cheney
threatened to attack all “rogue nations,” including Iran
and North Korea—shows that it is easy to destroy but
difficult to win a war. Iraq will last longer in the
American memory than Vietnam.
Bush’s
third gift to the world was to prove that there can be
no consensus to govern without respect for international
law. The failure to ratify a single international treaty
(starting with Kyoto) has aroused growing irritation
and, as a consequence, the treaty against cluster bombs
has been ratified by almost every country on earth.
Moreover, abuses at Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib, the
rendition of prisoners to countries that practice
torture, the declaration that the Geneva Conventions are
no longer binding and that torture is legitimate in the
event of war, along with similar initiatives, have
isolated the United States and dethroned it as the
champion of democracy and human rights.
The
fourth contribution may seem less important, as it is
only internal: the arrogation by the executive under
Bush of extraordinary powers over the legislature and
judiciary has provoked a clamor for the reestablishment
of the balance of power among the branches of
government, a crucial foundation of democracy.
The
fifth contribution, in contrast, is of universal value.
Bush has proven that it is not possible to lie and rule
with impunity in an age when the people, more than ever
before, want their governments to be responsible and
accountable to the voters. In the final stretch of the
Bush presidency, numerous former administration members
and officials have stated in books, interviews and
articles that the administration repeatedly lied to the
public and deliberately manipulated it, and not only
about Iraq. After they leave office, the final settling
of accounts with Bush and Cheney will be even more
explosive.
The
sixth contribution is certainly the most important:
thanks to Bush, the United States has significantly lost
its right to consider itself a country with a ‘’manifest
destiny.” A Boston Globe poll finds that the number of
Americans who believe in the ‘’American dream’’ has
dropped to 32 percent from 60 percent before Bush took
office. The fall of the dollar symbolizes the dramatic
decline of the United States as an imperial nation and
world leader. Polls show that the United States has
experienced an unprecedented drop in prestige: after
September 11, the whole world declared its support for
the commander in chief of an aggressed nation. Today,
the same polls show that a significant portion of the
world’s population considers the United States to be the
greatest threat to international peace.
Bush,
thus, is an exceptional politician who, in a mere eight
years, has managed to profoundly change his country and
the world. I doubt that as president, Obama would be
able to motivate the formation of an opposition as vast
as that of the World Social Forum at Porto Alegre. The
clamor of hundreds of thousands of people against
imperialism and for a different world was the result of
the radicalization produced in this period. Without it,
the creation of a global civil society would have been
far slower. For this reason, I propose, and ask the
world to second me, that the next Nobel Peace Prize be
awarded to George W. Bush.
Roberto Savio is founder and president emeritus of IPS. |