HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  

    George W. Bush deserves Nobel Peace Prize

    ROME—With Barack Obama likely to win the White House this November, George W. Bush has become more of a lame duck than other US presidents at the end of their terms. The unusually high turnout in the primary elections demonstrated the desire of the American populace to free itself from an administration that is already considered the worst in American history.

    But if we judge Bush objectively, that is to say, by the results, I believe the moment has come for lovers of peace and international cooperation to come together to grant him the formal recognition he deserves as the US president that has done the most to create a more just and more democratic world in which the old thinking on the military force and manifest destiny of the superpower is in profound crisis.

    The first major contribution of Bush was to demonstrate that unilateralism can no longer work in a world that is increasingly multipolar. Predictions of the decline of the United States are debatable, but what is certain is the growing weight of countries like China, India and Brazil. Bush’s policies have increased Washington’s isolation, not its ability to lead. It is symbolic that at the beginning of his first term, the United Nations was in crisis and the Bretton Woods system (the World Bank and International Monetary Fund) in a dominant position. At the end of his second term the reverse is true.

    Another important contribution by Bush is the definitive refutation of the theory that war can resolve conflict. The fact that the United States, which spends on arms as much as the 14 next top weapons spenders, finds itself bogged down with its allies in the two wars that it has entered into—despite the fact that Vice President Cheney threatened to attack all “rogue nations,” including Iran and North Korea—shows that it is easy to destroy but difficult to win a war. Iraq will last longer in the American memory than Vietnam.

    Bush’s third gift to the world was to prove that there can be no consensus to govern without respect for international law. The failure to ratify a single international treaty (starting with Kyoto) has aroused growing irritation and, as a consequence, the treaty against cluster bombs has been ratified by almost every country on earth. Moreover, abuses at Guantánamo and Abu Ghraib, the rendition of prisoners to countries that practice torture, the declaration that the Geneva Conventions are no longer binding and that torture is legitimate in the event of war, along with similar initiatives, have isolated the United States and dethroned it as the champion of democracy and human rights.

    The fourth contribution may seem less important, as it is only internal: the arrogation by the executive under Bush of extraordinary powers over the legislature and judiciary has provoked a clamor for the reestablishment of the balance of power among the branches of government, a crucial foundation of democracy.

    The fifth contribution, in contrast, is of universal value. Bush has proven that it is not possible to lie and rule with impunity in an age when the people, more than ever before, want their governments to be responsible and accountable to the voters. In the final stretch of the Bush presidency, numerous former administration members and officials have stated in books, interviews and articles that the administration repeatedly lied to the public and deliberately manipulated it, and not only about Iraq.  After they leave office, the final settling of accounts with Bush and Cheney will be even more explosive.

    The sixth contribution is certainly the most important: thanks to Bush, the United States has significantly lost its right to consider itself a country with a ‘’manifest destiny.”  A Boston Globe poll finds that the number of Americans who believe in the ‘’American dream’’ has dropped to 32 percent from 60 percent before Bush took office. The fall of the dollar symbolizes the dramatic decline of the United States as an imperial nation and world leader. Polls show that the United States has experienced an unprecedented drop in prestige: after September 11, the whole world declared its support for the commander in chief of an aggressed nation. Today, the same polls show that a significant portion of the world’s population considers the United States to be the greatest threat to international peace.

    Bush, thus, is an exceptional politician who, in a mere eight years, has managed to profoundly change his country and the world. I doubt that as president, Obama would be able to motivate the formation of an opposition as vast as that of the World Social Forum at Porto Alegre. The clamor of hundreds of thousands of people against imperialism and for a different world was the result of the radicalization produced in this period. Without it, the creation of a global civil society would have been far slower. For this reason, I propose, and ask the world to second me, that the next Nobel Peace Prize be awarded to George W. Bush. 

    Roberto Savio is founder and president emeritus of IPS.

    OTHER STORIES

    Editorial: A chair, a sweater—for the world?

    THE situation of Cebu’s furniture industry, which has thrived for decades as a class unto itself in the global market, is one worth reviewing by those who make economic policy at the national and local government levels, and those who want to stay in business in these challenging times.

    read more

    Outside the Box: The coming commodity-price collapse

    The indirect consequence of the oil-price rise and the dollar-value drop is the largest increase in commodity prices since 1973. Commodities finished their best first-half year in 35 years. And what is unique about 1973?

    read more

    About Town: Making every drop count

    ‘Water is not like oil. There is no substitute. If we continue to take it for granted, much of the earth is going to run short of water or food—or both.” This insight comes from a recent study made by the International Food Policy Research Institute and the International Water Management Institute entitled “Global Water Outlook to 2025: Averting an Impending Crisis.”

    read more

    Tax Law for Business: More teeth in the administration of justice

    Republic Act 9503, or “An Act enlarging the organizational structure of the Court of Tax Appeals, amending for the purpose certain sections of the law creating the Court of Tax Appeals and for other purposes,” was signed into law by the President on June 11.

    read more

    Alálaong bagá: Learning from the meek and humble

    He came riding a donkey, distinguished and victorious; he came to proclaim peace, offering a universal hope to the nations (Zechariah 9:9-10). He called those who are weary and burdened in life, and promised them solace and rest (Matthew11:25-30).

    read more

    Inter Press Service: George W. Bush deserves Nobel Peace Prize

    ROME—With Barack Obama likely to win the White House this November, George W. Bush has become more of a lame duck than other US presidents at the end of their terms. The unusually high turnout in the primary elections demonstrated the desire of the American populace to free itself from an administration that is already considered the worst in American history.

    read more

    Reflections from the Mirror: Assassination threat ignored?

    The announced claim of former Vice President Teofisto Guingona Jr. that he was approached by someone who offered to kill the President is not only a queer incident, but also indicates that former VP Guingona must have considered the threat against the President as frivolous. Either that or the former Veep is irresponsible.

    read more