|
When
Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita said, “The visit of
the President has been scheduled, and when the President
left, the situation, as far as the typhoon is concerned,
was still in its development stage,” was he lying?
I’ll let
Justice Secretary Raul Gonzalez answer the question.
In his
column on Monday, Gonzalez wrote, “I was thankful to be
there when Frank came and left behind a trail of
destruction and misery, and to experience and see the
extent of the damage. After the winds and rain subsided,
I was one of the first passengers to leave Iloilo to
make my report to the President personally before Her
Excellency left for that very important state visit to
the US.”
Gonzalez
wrote it, I didn’t. I merely brought it to your
attention.
When
House Majority Leader Arthur Defensor said, “It’s too
late for the President to back out. If the President
were to cancel, it would be a national embarrassment.
This is not an ordinary trip,” was he telling the whole
truth and nothing but?
That
statement can be “googled.” Easily.
In 1988,
Mikhail Gorbachev cut short his visit to the United
States after a devastating earthquake hit Armenia. No
one said his sudden departure embarrassed the Soviet
Union.
In May,
Xinhua, the Chinese news agency, reported that the Thai
prime minister decided to cancel his trip to China:
“[T]he Thai prime minister decided to cancel the trip to
China Tuesday morning, as he does not want to bother the
Chinese government which will be busy with
disaster-relief work after a 7.8-magnitude earthquake
hit Sichuan province on Monday in southwestern China . .
. .” Again, no one was embarrassed by the Thai prime
minister’s considerate action.
Should
Sen. Rodolfo Biazon be blamed for Gloria Arroyo’s
decision to order a US aircraft carrier bringing relief
goods for Typhoon Frank’s victims to stay out of
Philippine waters?
He is,
if we believe what Gloria Arroyo told a gathering of
Filipino Americans.
She
said, “[N]abasa ko sa news, may tagaating
nagbatikos na naman. Sabi may nuclear weapons daw
ang aircraft carrier, kaya bawal raw pumunta sa
Pilipinas.
“Kaya
tuloy, para iwasan na lang ang intriga, mananatili na
lang ito sa dulo ng territorial waters ng
Pilipinas tapos papasok-palabas yung mga tutulong.
Pinahirapan pa natin sila sa pagtutulong.”
Was Sen.
Francis Escudero raising a bogus issue about “impounded
funds” worth P6.6 billion that Gloria Arroyo can use for
relief, but won’t?
Escudero
said, “There is no reason aid should come in trickles to
flood-hit areas when there are certain segments in the
national budget, other than the calamity fund, which can
be tapped for disaster work.”
He
pointed to the P2 billion Kilos Asenso Fund, the P3.6
billion Financial Subsidy to Local Government Units and
the P1 billion Kalayaan Barangay Fund and reminded
Gloria Arroyo:
“The
release of these funds is contingent on the President’s
approval. She should dig into these funds so there will
be more resources available for relief work. These
[funds] are bigger than the $100,000 aid the President
got from the US State Department, one which was met with
profuse thanks from her, as if she had won the lotto,
when in fact she has, at her easy disposal, all the
above-mentioned funds to use in times such as this,” he
added.
The
question we should be asking Gloria Arroyo, is why she
is hanging on to those funds? Is she is saving them for
a rainy day?
Buencamino is a fellow of Action for Economic Reforms (www.aer.ph). |