HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  

    Editorials:

    Illustration by Jimbo Albano

    Government should take over

    IT is said that Sulpicio Lines has racked up more casualties in civilian shipping than the German General Staff in any comparable period of the War for the Atlantic during World War II. There was Doña Paz with more than 4,000 casualties, which broke the Guinness Book of Records.

    There was Princess of the Orient with more than 200 casualties, and lately Princess of the Stars with close to 800 people feared dead. You will notice that Sulpicio Lines, unlike all but two other entities, is not preceded by “the.” That is because Sulpicio Lines is as closely associated with death as God and the CIA.

    And, to this day, Sulpicio Lines has eluded either full accountability or correspondingly tighter regulation than its funereal reputation might lead one to expect. And the reason is that in cases like Sulpicio Lines, the culpability of the subject of government investigation offers, by the financial success of its risky operations, the irresistible temptation to absolve it in the teeth of incontrovertible evidence.

    In short, Sulpicio Lines is and has long been a very profitable enterprise. To its credit, the reason is that it offers the cheapest rates of any public convenience on the high seas and apparently does so by cutting back on basic safety and ordinary prudence. It is as though—and it probably is because—both Sulpicio and the government agencies that should be watching it merely wait out the public interest, which is sure to make way with the equally urgent public need to travel, and travel cheap. In short, when nature calls, if you gotta go, you gotta go. The owners of Sulpicio Lines and their government protectors know this. Traveling on Sulpicio, according to its critics, is like being forced to play Russian roulette by your Vietcong captors. In bad weather, four chambers are loaded. 

    Worse, a rightly cynical public plays along with the owners of Sulpicio Lines and its government protectors by saying that nothing will come of the present investigation anymore than anything came of the ones before. And so, Sulpicio Lines goes its merry way, laughing delightedly like its female spokesperson on TV, apparently over a surprising—even to her—ability to speak some English.

    The problem with being cynical is that it is a self-filling attitude. If you don’t believe anything will come of anything, nothing will happen, indeed. And if you truly believe Sulpicio Lines will literally get away with murder, it will.

    It is time to do something about that attitude and about the situation. It is time to prove the owners of Sulpicio Lines and its government protectors wrong. And that is not by haling the owners to a congressional inquiry or before justice department investigation or even to court. It is by government taking over the operations of Sulpicio Lines so as to continue its public service but with the precautions it has studiously ignored, and denying the owners of Sulpicio Lines the wherewithal to escape accountability again.

    To be sure, in the Steel Seizure cases, the US Supreme Court struck down President Truman’s takeover of the operations of steel companies that were essential, in the executive’s view, to the Korean War effort. He wanted to avert a potentially crippling labor strike. But the Court there said the president, in that case, could point to no legal authority for the takeover of a private business, which was only a few of several more and bigger steel companies.

    That would not be the case with Sulpicio Lines because every legislative franchise to operate a public utility or service provides for government takeover in an emergency. There is legal authority for the President to order a takeover.

    Article 12, Section 17 of the Constitution provides that in times of national emergency, when the public interest so requires, the state may, during the emergency and under reasonable terms prescribed by the state, temporarily take over or direct the operation of any privately owned public utility or business affected with public interest. There is a constitutional mandate for the President to order a takeover.

    And there is constitutional authority that this power does not require enabling legislation, allows the President herself to dictate reasonable terms to the enforcing agencies and that any business affected with a public interest like travel is covered. She can order it today, and from as far away as Washington, D.C.

    She must use the military so that no conflict-of-interest issue can arise, as would happen if she asked a competing company to carry out her directive. And, of course, she cannot order the Maritime Industry Authority (Marina) to do it because the Marina’s diligence is precisely in question, as might be likened to asking Al Capone to manage Alcatraz.

    The typhoon season is upon us, and it just started. People need to travel, and most people can only travel cheaply by sea. The government needs to assure their safety. Note: The word is “assure,” which is to make provision for safety. It is not “ensure,” which is to make provision for loss. Sulpicio already does the latter, in a token manner of speaking, for its insurer has fixed the value of every life taken at P200,000, if the victim’s family is willing and able to wait out the long settlement process, or for much less if they need pesos, pronto.

    The assurance of the government cannot come by way of yet another warning on a recidivist management that knows it can get away with murder again. The government’s assurance must come by an actual takeover of the operations of this particular yet essential public utility so that the public will be safe and justice will not be waylaid in the courts. 

    It is also good for their souls that Filipinos see why government takeovers are not bad, per se, but provided in the Constitution because, when time is of the essence and the public safety requires it, the government we pay for must step in and take matters in its own hands. The possibility of abuse in no way derogates from the utility and necessity of this extraordinary power. That would be real people power, for it fleshes out the people’s primary right of self-defense.

    OTHER STORIES

    Editorial: Government should take over

    IT is said that Sulpicio Lines has racked up more casualties in civilian shipping than the German General Staff in any comparable period of the War for the Atlantic during World War II. There was Doña Paz with more than 4,000 casualties, which broke the Guinness Book of Records.

    read more

    Outside the Box: Who is responsible for our lives?

    Our individual and collective hearts and prayers go to the victims and their families of the maritime disaster. No words of condolence can do much to relieve the grief. Financial assistance and donations in kind can lessen the suffering, and we all have an obligation to do what we can to help.

    read more

    What’s in a Name?: Wanted: More patents

    In a conversation with one of the country’s leading marine biochemists about the low number of patents being filed by higher education institutions (HEIs), two factors emerged as discouraging patent filings.

    read more

    Alálaong bagá: Heroes of the faith

    Pawns in the politics of the powerful

    Herod Agrippa I, the grandson of the hated Herod the Great, had ordered the beheading of James, John’s brother and the leader of the Christian community in Jerusalem.

    read more

    About Town: Subsidies: Good or bad?

    This question is perhaps best addressed to the poor or those who have to struggle mightily to make ends meet on a daily basis, and I think the answer should be obvious, given the skyrocketing cost of living nowadays.

    read more

    Tax Law for Business: As a matter of procedure, make that offer

    When we hear politicians hurling accusations against fellow politicians on the other side of the fence, we often hear the one being accused of a wrongdoing shouting back: “Where is your evidence?”

    read more

    Reflections from the Mirror: Frank’s fury and Philip’s turnaround

    IT came like a thief in the night. The warnings were taken lightly, as usual, and the skies never showed signs of Mother Nature about to go berserk.

    read more