HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  •  

    We do not ‘need’ foreign investment

    In this column on Thursday, I wrote about articles in the South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo which said some negative things about the smaller Asian economies, including the Philippines. Many of these comments were unjustified and factually unsupported. I said this was “Philippines-bashing.”

    I received several e-mails commenting on the attitude of Koreans toward the Philippines, including from a Filipino who wrote, “We are living here in Korea and feel those things. Some even ask: ‘Do you have refrigerators in your country?’”

    Another wrote of the free-trade agreement that the Koreans want so that they can export more Korean goods to the Philippines. Since 2003 we have bought almost $2 billion more than we have sold to Korea.

    Because of the negative comments about many other Asian countries, my column ended with what I though was a satirical, although incorrect, paraphrase of Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile’s recent comments. “Get out of Asia if you do not like the way business and government is done here.”

    The e-mail inbox exploded. “Well, to get to know how business and government is done in the Philippines, you just need to read the newspapers. And then you will not invest in the Philippines.”

    And another; “The Philippines desperately needs foreign investments. Don’t bite the hand that feeds you. You need those investors!”

    Do we?

    Foreign investment in the Philippines is widely misunderstood. It is becoming a popular slogan instead of being a practical economic concept. We live in a world of fast, nutritionally incomplete food and fast, rationally incomplete thinking.

    Apparently, most people think foreign investment is the same as a rich ninong (godfather) handing out pamasko (gifts) at Christmas time. And, of course, children are cautioned to be polite and respectful for fear that tito (uncle) will be offended and stop the giving.

    Let me make my position very clear. The Philippines does not NEED foreign investment by the definition most people use for “need” with a sense of desperation and panic. This investment is desirable, can be beneficial, comes with its own unique advantages and disadvantages and should be strongly encouraged.

    However, the issue is more complex than what you usually read in the newspapers.

    The newfound “wisdom” about foreign investments may come from the outsourcing companies, emblazoned with the names of fine foreign firms, such as Convergys. Yet, Philippine outsourcing started in the early 1990s with (surprise, surprise) a Filipino company, Saztec Philippines (Thank you, Alan Fraser. May you rest in peace), providing data-transcription services to American companies. Our outsourcing business did grow with foreign firms partnering with or purchasing locally owned and operated outsourcing companies.

    Do any of the “Bow before the foreign investors!” movement members realize that all the malls of the Sy, Gokongwei, Ayala and Gaisano groups are locally owned? Yes, to a certain extent, they were built with “foreign money,” funds that may have been borrowed from the international banks or in joint ventures. The same applies to the property companies. But, believe it or not, you may be shocked to know that the prosperity the Philippines may have was ultimately built by Filipinos, not the foreigners.

    Foreign investment is important in three particular situations.

    The first is in an industry that requires a very long-term and capital-intensive financial structure and where profits cannot be realized for an extended period. This perfectly describes the mineral and petroleum exploration and extraction business.

    In this case, local companies do not have the financial depth to adequately fund and provide long-term financial support to this industry. Bring in the foreigners and give them free San Miguel Pale Pilsen and lechon (roast pork) to help keep them happy for as long as it takes. Everyone, foreigner and Filipino, will profit from this relationship.

    Second, local companies sometimes do not have the complete necessary expertise, experience and infrastructure to maximize opportunities. Our outsourcing industry needs foreign investment to fully exploit the business. An affiliate of American Airlines started outsourcing in 1983 by using typists in Barbados to key in data from used airline tickets.

    We did not know the word “outsourcing” then. Foreign companies like Convergys bought in and had credibility with their large, existing client base that would trust Convergys’s opinion of the Filipino ability to do the job. Thanks for having confidence in the Filipino work force, Convergys.

    SM investments is collaborating with Sofitel hotels to build a five-star hotel in Mactan costing P2.8 billion. Again, expertise and experience, not solely money, is the motivation for this “foreign investment.”

    Third, need a huge amount of investment capital in a hurry? Need $15 billion to build the 40-hectare Bagong Nayong Pilipino-Manila Bay Integrated tourism project? Of course, you look to foreign investors. That only makes sense since there is more investment money offshore than onshore.

    This is a smart investment choice from foreign investors Malaysian Resorts World Bhd., Aruze Corp. of Japan, Genting Berhad Group of Malaysia and Bloombury Investments Ltd. All of these companies will make a fortune in Philippine-generated profits and create 250,000 local jobs. Have another Super Dry, gentlemen. We are buying the beer to celebrate our joint venture.

    The Philippines needs a regulatory environment procedure to attract, easily facilitate and welcome desirable and profitable foreign investment. Yet, to take the attitude of a bargirl waiting for the foreign sailors to arrive is not only degrading but also completely counterproductive to advancing the goal of economic self-sufficiency.

    Foreign investment is but another economic tool for a nation’s prosperity. It is not the only tool. 

    Email comments to mangun@email.com.

    OTHER STORIES

    Editorial: Chuck knee-jerk solutions

    EXPECT the usual slew of inquiries, finger-pointing and hand-wringing as the nation contemplates the immensity of the tragedy that befell, for the nth time, a passenger ferry of Sulpicio Lines.

    read more

    Outside the Box: We do not ‘need’ foreign investment

    In this column on Thursday, I wrote about articles in the South Korean newspaper Chosun Ilbo which said some negative things about the smaller Asian economies, including the Philippines. Many of these comments were unjustified and factually unsupported. I said this was “Philippines-bashing.”

    read more

    William Pesek: Spielberg goes to Bollywood to tap India’s boom

    It’s a rare Hollywood tale that has roles for Steven Spielberg, India, warring billionaire brothers, hedge funds and the power shift from West to East.

    read more

    Omerta: Even (Epira) rules are rigged

    The full story about how the Manila Electric Co.’s (Meralco) outrageously high electric power rates came about has, of course, yet to be told. As the folks in Texas would put it, we ain’t heard nothing yet. 

    read more

    Mirror on the wall: What happened to Nograles’s move to abolish VAT on power consumption?

    High power rates in the Philippines, second only to those of prosperous Japan, can be traced to the value-added tax (VAT) and royalties, but it seems the government is not keen on slashing them to give electric consumers some form of relief from their daily grind.

    read more

    Sen. Edgardo J. Angara: Stopping urban slums through rural development

    Last year the United Nations Population Fund estimated that by 2030, 60 percent of the world’s population would live in cities. Of this, 80 percent would be located in developing countries in Asia and Africa.

    read more

    Philip M. Lustre Jr.: The tragedy of local officials

    It’s the height of a Shakepearean drama that local officials who work the hardest are the least likely to become president. They are certainly the most qualified and fit to assume the presidency. But the current situation doesn’t favor them to aspire for the nation’s top political post.

    read more

    The Saudi spigot

    When President Bush traveled to Saudi Arabia in mid-May to plead for an increase in oil production, his friend King Abdullah resisted him.

    read more