HOME PAGE ABOUT US CONTACT US SUBSCRIBE ADVERTISE ARCHIVES
TOP STORIES NATION ECONOMY COMPANIES SHIPPING OPINION PERSPECTIVE LIFE SPORTS BANKING
SEARCH ENGINE
WWWOur Site
Anchored by Jonathan dela Cruz, Salvador Escudero, Boying Remulla, Teddy Boy Locsin and Alvin Capino
Monday to Friday
8:00pm-10:00pm

ARTICLE SERVICES
  • bookmark this page
  • print this article
  • view archive
  • Mixed views on CARP extension
     
    By Claudeth Mocon
    Correspondent

    THE Presidential Commission on Good Government (PCGG) Tuesday appealed to the House of Representatives to fast-track approval of the proposed measure to extend the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program (CARP) for five years because of 1.86 million hectares of agricultural lands that have not been placed under the land-reform law.

    “We have to extend the CARP because the farmers are the direct beneficiaries of all these ill-gotten wealth we recovered and will be recovering,” said Narciso Nario, the commissioner for legal affairs. 

    The CARP’s land-acquisition and -distribution component is set to expire on June 10, two decades after the CARP law was enacted.

    During the debate on the bill last week, Deputy Majority Leader and Cavite Rep. Jesus Crispin Remulla said that in the past 20 years of CARP, many of the certificates of land ownership award (CLOAs) have been sold and that none of the children of the farmer-beneficiaries want to till the soil—which “could endanger the productivity of the land.”

    This, apparently, is one reason Rep. Edcel Lagman of Albay, member of the agrarian-reform and appropriations committees, also wants the extension bill to provide for at least one year indefeasibility of distributed lands.

    The proposed measure also seeks to appropriate a minimum P100 billion, part of which would be to increase the allocation of support services for farmers to 40 percent from 25 percent from the CARP funds.

    But Sen. Panfilo Lacson wants something more focused—that the entire P100 billion be entirely for support services to make sure beneficiaries have the means to till their land. He added that mostly lack of capital and weak harvests due to lack of more productive technology results in distributed farms being sold or converted.

    He added a minor industry has also arisen from this flaw in the the CARP implementation—that it has been turned into a milking cow for unscrupulous parties, including some officials and employees of the Department of Agrarian Reform.

    Lacson strongly suggested it would be better for government to channel these funds to much-needed intervention services for farmer beneficiaries such as irrigation, farm-to-market roads, postharvest facilities, technical support, and availability of seeds and other inputs.

    “Instead of extending the CARP, which has been the milking cow of unscrupulous DAR employees during the past so many years, I am inclined to push for an efficient support program for the farmer beneficiaries already covered by the CARP. We have seen so many cases of farmer beneficiaries having land to till but with no means to do it,” said Lacson.

    He said the last thing farmers want is to see a repeat of the P728-million fertilizer scam engineered by then Agriculture undersecretary Jocelyn Bolante so that such interventions should all be aboveboard.

    He added that “I have information that the government has been losing [land reform] cases before the courts lately. Is this happening based on the merits, or is it happening for millions of reasons?” 

    Nario, meanwhile, had said the PCGG is now working doubly hard to ensure that there would be faster recoveries for the farmers. Are they winning? “I appeal to Congress they should extend immediately the life of CARP.” 

    Nario said that should the CARP law be allowed to lapse, then the proceeds of their recoveries of ill-gotten wealth amassed during the Marcos dictatorship from the Marcoses and their cronies would go directly to the general funds.

    From there the allocation of funds for the farmers would be in the hands of lawmakers, which he indicated is a longer process.

    Malacañang on Saturday stated that President Arroyo is ready to certify as urgent the extension bill, with a request to include a provision that allows the use of lands covered by CARP as loan collateral for agriculture-related businesses.

    Records of the Departments of Agrarian Reform and of Environment and Natural Resources show the government still has to acquire 1.86 million hectares of agricultural lands that could be distributed to farmers, which is the target of the proposed 5-year extension.

    Meanwhile, Akbayan Rep. Risa Hontiveros accused colleagues from Negros Island, led by Negros Occidental Rep. Ignacio Arroyo, of blocking passage of the CARP extension bill.

    More than 200,000 hectares of the 1.1 million hectares that DAR has yet to distribute to farmers, she said, are in Negros. She thus warned of “midnight conversion” and “reclassification” of lands if Congress passes the CARP extension bill.

    OTHER STORIES

    NG plans to borrow P35B more


    Go online, vote for rp tourism sites in new7wonders.com


    Change in Filipino lifestyle to ease energy woes—ADB, DOE


    More VAT relief options offered


    P20 wage hike not enough, concedes NSCB


    Mixed views on CARP extension


    Malacañang: No link with snap-polls move


    DOJ, Senate cool to snap-election idea


    Senate summons JFC heads for grilling


    ‘Press Burma to heed HR provisions’


    Meralco: GSIS statements ‘irresponsible’