|
The next
investment scandal may have just passed us without our
noticing it. Like most in Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s
administration, they strike like thieves in the night.
This
controversy has victimized much too stealthily, hidden
by the ruckus of insidious boardroom rabble; slithering
first, sneaking up and then suddenly pouncing. We didn’t
notice because we were otherwise preoccupied with the
complexity of hostile corporate raids. Or maybe we
aren’t affected, neither being rank and file nor lowly
paid government employees and public-school
teachers—constituencies of pension funds from where
these spawn.
Pensions
are investment vehicles built from passive contributions
that earn through prudent outlays eventually paid back
as annuities. For many, these constitute rainy-day
savings.
Being
such, we commiserate with the thousands of teachers and
the millions more government employees who lost over P12
billion when their investments in a listed electricity
distribution company lost its value.
From the
time their pension manager decided on a crusade, to its
lowest point when spooked foreign investors figuratively
took the first plane out, values slid by over P4.6
billion by one count and multiples of that by others.
The
BusinessMirror’s section editor Emeterio Sd. Perez
estimated one pension’s paper losses at over P4.607
billion from a P20.554-billion value a month ago to
P15.945 billion just last Monday. A monthly loss of
22.42 percent, annualize that, and we might have the
basis for economic sabotage.
For the
state pension fund for the private sector, likewise,
heavily invested in the same utility, Perez estimated
investment-value depletion at P1.138 billion. Adding
those from other government agencies—one, the government
depository, another, a preneed agency, and still
another, a housing-development fund—Perez estimates
additional losses of P6.712 billion.
While
paper losses are not realized until transacted, even
finance sophomores know that the market capitalization
of an investment is critical in the trust-fund industry.
Because
pension liabilities often increase unexpectedly,
offsetting asset accounts cannot just suddenly
degenerate. When liquid assets other than cash dissipate
as equity investment values fall, liquidity becomes
critical when pension payouts come due. A pension can
either monetize its equity investments and kick in
realized losses or draw from its cash account. Both
ways, the drain of paper-losses will readily be felt.
Pensioners are not your garden-variety investors. Their
divestments are compelled not by choice but by
circumstance. Drawdowns and liquidations occur all too
frequently—sudden when related to loans, emergency,
death and calamity benefits and programmed when based on
retirement actuarials.
On a
pension fund’s balance sheet, after cash and deposits,
investments in stocks and marketable securities are the
most liquid. Market capitalization, computed by
multiplying the market value of a security by the number
of shares, is critical to a pension. In its case the
investment value is the market price multiplied by the
number of shares held.
Where
the market capitalization of a major investment, such as
those in a listed utility, decomposes by P12.5 billion,
whether paper losses or realized, these exert tremendous
pressures on liquidity because of the constancy of
payouts. The cash account must compensate if it can.
Given pensioners are lowly paid employees, claims are
frequent. By impairing liquid assets, pensioner’s
nonprogrammed claims can be delayed further, emergency
and calamity loans reduced and even actuarials
compromised.
Moreover, when stocks secure debts as these fall in
value, effective costs of capital rise exponentially and
impact negatively on pensioner benefits.
Both the
integrity of a pension and its longevity are functions
of contributions, liquidity and investment value.
Impairing one seriously endangers others.
Remember
that these are the funds of the lowest-paid in Arroyo’s
economy. Add up the losses inflicted, try to comprehend
the magnitude of a P12.459-billion depletion and then
try not to scream bloody murder.
Update
to include the hysterics, yelling and yelping during and
after last week’s corporate power plays and the totals
breach the statutory parameters for plunder.
To be
fair, losses should be seen against gains albeit the
latter might be nonrecurring never-again events.
Last
year, anyone invested on the market index alone would
have earned. With one-time divestments, one pension
realized P153.4 million in revenues. These nonrecurring
divestments accounted for over 12 percent of total.
Consolidated revenues were P86.34 billion with insurance
revenues at P48.20 billion. Its claims and benefits
payouts totaled P32.79 billion.
Specifically, P10.4 billion gains from the stocks sales
from three blue-chip companies accounted for most of its
liquidity. The largest were from a single divestment
which sale accounted for P5.7 billion. Unfortunately,
one month’s actions costing P4.06 billion nearly negates
its largest gains.
P12.5
billion in accounting losses depletes the value of
pensions because these are rated according to the
current values of its investments, not purchase prices
or prospective open-ended values. Because one month’s
22.42-percent depletion resulted from controversies
compared with gains from nonrecurring divestments,
fiduciary irresponsibility is not limited to when funds
are invested.
Fiduciary irresponsibility includes the imprudent use of
these funds. A political vendetta, should that underlie
investment strategy, hardly qualifies as a prudent
application.
Trust is
critical where pensions are concerned. More where these
are controlled by political appointees, because not only
are pensioners vulnerable and passive investors, they
are also helpless. It is not easy to take pension
managers to court and sue them for impropriety,
imprudence or fraud. More so when dotted lines lead from
fiduciary officers to impeachable executives with a
patented prepaid, get-out-of-jail pass.
To
appreciate the magnitude of this issue, let us use
references we’ve become familiar with. At National Power
Corp.’s high generation costs of P6.70/kilowatt-hour
(kWh), a P12.5-billion loss is 1.86 billion kWh. Where
rice is priced at P30/kilo, a P12.5-billion loss is
415.30 million kilos. Where a national broadband bribe
is $200 million, a P12.5-billion loss is equivalent to
63 broadband deals. With those larger numbers, this
fiasco suddenly seems worth every peso lost. |