|
The
National Power Corp. (Napocor) gave a rather odd, if not
downright funny, response to the column I wrote last
week, entitled “Cyril del Callar—incompetent or
corrupt?”
The
reply was a non sequitur, a quaint way of drawing you
away from the main issue, which was the absurdity of the
P1.3-billion coal-supply contract it awarded to an
Australian firm on April 2.
My
column merely expressed the view that del Callar would
have a lot of explaining to do for the contract, which
was awarded on a negotiated basis to Hunter Valley Coal
Corp. of Australia, through its local representative
Glencore Far East Philippines AG, on April 2 at a
shockingly high price of $84 per metric ton, far above
the normal import price that ranges between $20 and $30
per metric ton.
Napocor’s justification for the outrageously priced
importation was that an abnormal surge in demand for
power had put the coal-fired power plants of Napocor in
the grip of an acute fuel shortage, implying that the
shortage had to be filled right away through an
emergency, hang-the-cost coal importation for the sake
of ending those pesky rotating brownouts.
My
column also cited the reaction of Sen. Aquilino “Nene”
Pimentel Jr., who had the suspicion that the rotating
brownouts one or two months ago were contrived or
stage-managed to justify the huge importation, the cost
of which would definitely be passed on to power
consumers in the form of higher power rates.
Napocor’s reaction came in the form of a 19-paragraph
letter to the editor of this paper. The letter of Dennis
Gana, Napocor’s corporate communications manager, was
published in the May 25 issue of the BusinessMirror,
with the title “Stop spreading rumors—Napocor.”
Gana
tried to draw attention to the power-rate increases that
could ensue from the huge coal importation, and away
from the whys and wherefores of the Hunter Valley Coal
importation. He then said it was not true that there was
an imminent power-rate increase; and that those who have
said so were rumormongering.
With
this kind of response, Gana adroitly sidesteps the issue
of the overpriced coal importation. He might as well
have said: “So what if we authorized this scandalously
priced importation? It’s not true that it will result in
higher power rates in the short and medium term as you
suggest. It takes time for the Energy Regulatory Board [ERC]
to decide on rate increases. There will be no rate
increases in the short and medium term. So stop
spreading false rumors about an imminent power-rate
increase. Spreading rumors of this sort only creates
undue concern.”
Anyway,
that’s more or less the central message of Gana’s
19-paragraph letter.
It was
in the 12th paragraph where this main message was
buried: “Thus, there is no truth whatsoever of any
electricity-price increases in the short or
medium term, unless it has gone through a public
hearing, and the thorough review and analysis of the ERC.”
No
matter how his spokesman may try to tap-dance around the
issue, del Callar still has a lot of explaining to do
regarding the Hunter Valley Coal contract. And he may
have to do his explaining under oath to the Joint
Congressional Power Committee (JCPC), because the Hunter
Valley Coal contract was simply too big to escape public
notice.
For one
thing, it has already shaken up wholesale prices at the
Wholesale Electricity Spot Market (WESM). Despite Gana’s
explanation that it was “an abnormal surge in demand due
to the extreme summer heat” that caused the rotating
brownouts, the public—and this includes two or three
prominent members of the JCPC—remains suspicious that
something rotten is going on somewhere. That suspicion
must be laid to rest for
del Callar’s sake, assuming he is on the up and up in this
deal.
The
question that needs to be answered is why did Napocor
fail to anticipate the coal shortage by stockpiling on
the required supply? Is it so incompetent that it did
not anticipate any surge in power demand during the
extreme summer heat?
Napocor
has no business purchasing its fuel requirements on a
short-term basis the way it just did. In any well-run
power system, sufficient fuel inventory is a must. The
practice, if I remember right, is to maintain 30- to
45-day supply at any time of the year.
I was
told that at the time the Hunter Valley Coal deal was
closed, Napocor had a fuel inventory for its coal-fired
plants equivalent to only four days’ supply.
The big
question the JCPC might ask is, how much was the
commission, if there was any at all, on this
P1.3-billion deal, and who were the beneficiaries, if
there were any at all?
And oh,
by the way, Gana’s assurance that no power-rate increase
will be imposed on the public “in the short or medium
term, unless it has gone through a public hearing, and
the thorough review and analysis by the ERB” is a
cryptic message that only means the inevitable rate
increase will be passed on to us a little later than the
medium term.
The way
I see it, the matter of the coal-importation overprice
will be swept under the rug for the meantime. It will be
swept out again when nobody’s looking. Sooner or later,
whether it’s next year or even after 2010, it will be
the public that will have to bear the cost of the Hunter
Valley Coal deal. There is no escaping it even if the
national government absorbs the loss, assuming it is
chalked up in Napocor’s books as a loss.
In the
end, we the people will pay for it, the way we somehow
have to bear the tens of billions in losses that this
power agency has been incurring through mismanagement or
because of corruption ever since it was established more
than two generations ago.
Omerta_bdc@yahoo.com |