|
AT the
beginning of this year, even since late last year, both
the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and the Bureau of
Customs (BOC) were complaining that the tax-collection
targets assigned to them for 2008 were unreasonably
high.
They are
concerned, after their failure to achieve their
respective targets in 2007, that despite the continuous
appreciation of the peso vis-à-vis the US dollar and the
looming recession in the United States—which could
trigger a global slowdown, high oil prices and dampen
domestic consumption—there will still be lower tax
collections from both corporations and individual
taxpayers.
Finance
Secretary Gary Teves, on the other hand, has countered
that a growing economy should produce the same effect on
revenues—more business means more taxes.
He has a
valid point. Everybody knows that the 7.3-percent growth
in our gross domestic product (GDP) has been the highest
in 31 years, and even the prospects of a US recession is
not expected to depress our GDP growth this year
significantly.
So the
challenge is for Teves and his two revenue-generating
agencies to collect all the taxes possible to support
the P1.227-trillion budget for 2008, the highest in our
history.
We in
the Senate supported the enactment of a huge expenditure
program because we have a lot of catching up to do,
after the underspending in the past that was aimed at
narrowing the fiscal deficit.
We need
to spend more on infrastructure, social services, health
and education. It will be immoral to continue
sacrificing the needs of the people just to show that we
are spending only what we earn. Sometimes, too much
prudence is also a bad thing.
I can
appreciate the reluctance of Secretary Teves to accede
to the requests of the BIR and the BOC to lower their
collection targets because it means a higher fiscal
deficit after the record-low P9.4-billion deficit in
2007.
On the
other hand, I also understand the predicament of the two
agencies. Their collection records for 2007 do not
invite brighter prospects for this year.
My point
is that we have already passed the budget, and we are
all committed to raising the money to flesh it out, so
to speak. But the government should not just push the
revenue agencies to collect and collect.
The
government should also support the BIR, the BOC and
other revenue-generating agencies on two fronts:
incentives for the agencies and their personnel, and new
approaches to revenue generation.
These
agencies have been operating under a system that has
existed for many years. They can only do so much. True,
they can try harder and maybe collect more, but not
enough to catch up with the growing requirements of a
burgeoning population and a growing economy.
If need
be, the government should overhaul this system. Radical
policy changes are needed, and policy changes should
come from the top. Those on the top should also come up
with creative approaches to help the BIR and Customs
people collect more. These two agencies are the foot
soldiers, the enforcers; their commanders, the
policymakers, must provide the direction to accomplish
their mission.
The
proposed conversion of the BIR and the BOC into
government corporations may be feasible, but it will not
address the revenue requirement for 2008.
In the
meantime, some creative approaches may be implemented in
the department and bureau level. The BIR can establish
and use industry standards to determine how much it
should collect from an industry and from the individual
companies that operate within that industry. For
example, if an industry is making P1 billion a year, why
should it declare only P100 million?
Incidentally, the Department of Finance must do some
calculations on the real impact of the peso appreciation
on taxes, except for exporters, whose losses are very
real. The department must also find out how much revenue
increase should result from every percentage growth of
GDP with respect to each industry. Not all businesses
are doing well—shutdowns are not unusual—even in a
growing economy.
At the
same time, it is not enough to distribute plaques or
certificates of recognition to those who achieve or
exceed their collection targets. Incentives must be
provided to encourage our tax collectors to perform
their task more efficiently, and the incentives must be
more than the incentives offered by delinquent taxpayers
and tax evaders.
In other
words, Gary Teves and the government should do more than
tell the BIR and the BOC to collect what they are
assigned to collect. The two agencies must be provided
with the tools and the means to do their job, and their
people should be provided with incentives—benefits that
they can take to the bank—so they will have something to
expect when they accomplish their assigned tasks.
You may send your comments/feedback to mbvillar_comments@yahoo.com. |