|
MEMBERS
of the Senate foreign relations committee will be asked
to concur in or reject a full committee report
recommending conditional concurrence with the
controversial Japan-Philippines Economic Partnership
Agreement (Jpepa). The panel will submit the report when
Congress reconvenes in late April after the Holy Week
recess, Sen. Miriam Santiago said over the weekend.
“Ordinarily, a committee report is only two pages,
bearing the signatures of committee members. But, this
time, my committee report will be so extensive that it
will be a bound volume. Jpepa is an extraordinary
treaty, raising significant issues of constitutional and
international law,” Santiago, who chairs the foreign
relations committee, said.
She
revealed that the Jpepa committee report will comprise
at least four documents: the standard format with the
signatures of nearly all 23 members of the two
committees (on foreign relations and on trade); the
draft Senate resolution setting out the conditions for
concurrence; the report on the constitutional and legal
issues filed by Santiago as chairman of the foreign
relations committee; and the report on the trade and
industry issues to be filed by Sen. Mar Roxas as
chairman of the trade and commerce panel.
The
senator reported that the foreign relations committee
concluded its Jpepa hearings in November last year, but
Sen. Edgardo Angara requested for additional hearings
that took another month.
She
explained the Senate could not take up the Jpepa issue
in January because the budget bill “always takes
priority.” In February, it was then overtaken by the
broadband scandal inquiry. “This March there is an
extended Congress break. That is why April, when
session resumes, is the earliest date available,” she
added.
Santiago
hopes Japan would accept their proposed conditions that
will ensure the accord’s compliance with Philippine
constitutional requirements, without resubmitting the
Jpepa to the Japanese Diet or parliament.
“The
constitutional issues are paramount. Hence, the Senate
should ensure that the Supreme Court will not declare
Jpepa unconstitutional. If we do not take scrupulous
care in the Senate and the court declares it
unconstitutional, such declaration of
unconstitutionality will not be a valid defense, if
Japan
later sues the Philippines for nonperformance of
contract obligation. This is a provision of the
Vienna
Convention on the Law of Treaties,” she explained.
According to Santiago, she will be abroad until November
this year to campaign for the post of judge of the
International Court of Justice where, if elected by the
United Nations, she will be the only female among 15
judges elected worldwide on the basis of the highest
qualifications in international law.
But she
confirmed plans to be in
Manila
when session resumes in April so she can deliver her
Jpepa sponsorship speech and defend it in plenary before
resuming her hectic campaign schedule abroad. |