|
Five
years ago, President George W. Bush was looking for
someone to sell his tax cut to the American people. He
selected John Snow for the job, and installed him at
Treasury.
It was
unfair to cast Snow, a former chief executive of CSX
Corp., in that role. But Bush needed someone to sell his
plan, and Paul O’Neill wasn’t interested. (Willy Loman
was unavailable.)
Hank
Paulson is putting Snow to shame. The current Treasury
secretary is the ad man to Snow’s salesman. Paulson
comes up with a new marketing gimmick every month to
promote the government-led, private-sector plan to help
homeowners hang onto the homes they couldn’t afford. All
that’s missing is a catchy jingle.
In the
beginning, there was MLEC, for Master Liquidity
Enhancement Conduit. The Wall Street humor factory was
quick to provide its own acronym: More Losses Expected
to Come.
MLEC was
really a super-SIV, or structured investment vehicle,
designed to purchase the assets of SIVs after their
source of funding—the asset-backed commercial paper
market—dried up.
Citigroup Inc., Bank of America Corp. and JPMorgan Chase
& Co. agreed, with some gentle coaxing, to start a
proposed $80-billion fund to purchase SIV assets to
avoid a fire-sale liquidation.
Weeks
passed. Banks failed to line up to sign up. First the
size of the proposed fund shrank. Then its raison d’etre
evaporated, as banks absorbed their SIVs onto their
balance sheets. MLEC MAUD (met an untimely death).
More
than hope
Next,
Paulson came up with Hope Now (Despair Later?), an
alliance to help a select group of subprime borrowers
(those who were current on their mortgage payments) keep
their homes by freezing mortgage rates or helping
borrowers refinance.
The
private-sector initiative, coordinated by the public
sector (the Treasury), was a formalized process for
getting borrowers and lenders to renegotiate the terms
of the loan.
Admittedly, the process is more complicated when the
lender has nothing on the line, having bundled and sold
the loan before the ink was dry. Securitization seemed
to free mortgage originators from the burden of
performing due diligence. Why bother to document
employment, income or assets for a loan applicant if you
collect a fee and aren’t on the hook if he defaults?
Whether
it was improper incentives, lax regulation or misplaced
faith that house prices could only go up, lots of people
and institutions are now on the hook, which is why the
government has to give the appearance of “doing
something,” even if it’s largely cosmetic.
Help
from Hope
There
are plenty of nonprofit groups that provide counseling
to strapped homeowners. For example, the Homeownership
Preservation Foundation, which joined the Hope Now
Alliance in October and mans the phone hot line, has
been in business since 2002. It was created specifically
by GMAC/ResCap to provide foreclosure-prevention
counseling to its clients. (Someone was prescient about
the mortgage mess!)
Borrowers who took out loans they didn’t understand to
buy houses they couldn’t afford are not surprisingly
reluctant to contact their mortgage servicer. To the
extent the government’s public-information campaign is
encouraging homeowners to seek counseling to assess
possible mortgage-workout options, these initiatives are
good. Fewer foreclosures mean fewer homes added to the
already bloated inventory.
Previously, “beginning foreclosure was the only way to
get their attention,” said Michael Carliner, an
independent housing economist who was previously with
the National Association of Homebuilders.
Translating hope
A total
of 869,000 prime and subprime borrowers were helped in
the second half of 2007, including 217,000 loan
modifications, according to Hope Now. Modifications rose
125 percent in the fourth quarter compared with the
third, according to its web site.
Paulson
announced the initiative in October, by which time the
mortgage industry was already on the hope bandwagon. The
industry modified an estimated 54,000 loans and
established repayment plans for another 183,000
borrowers in the third quarter, according to the
Mortgage Bankers Association’s loan modification survey.
“It’s
not clear that there was any additional effort beyond
what the market would have dictated,” Carliner said. “As
the market got weaker, there was less incentive to
foreclose” and more to find an alternate solution.
Evolution of hope
The
latest entry in the government’s ad effort is Project
Lifeline, which sounds a lot more tangible than hope.
This week Paulson and six large mortgage servicers,
including Countrywide Financial Corp. and Citigroup,
agreed to a 30-day freeze on the foreclosure process for
homeowners 90 days delinquent on their payments. That
includes those with subprime, Alt-A or prime loans.
“The
Hope Now alliance is an evolving effort,” Paulson said
at a February 12 press conference.
The
question is, would it have evolved in the same way
without government gimmicks? Reckless or fraudulent
lending is not a behavior the government should appear
to be rewarding.
The last
thing the government wants is to create a moral hazard,
or encourage risky behavior by providing a safety net.
Rather, it ostensibly wants to help those who did
nothing reckless or wrong but are being swept out to sea
with the tide of bad loans.
“Operation Hope Springs Eternal,” anyone? |