|
It is a
wonder how the
Philippines
can easily file suit against Thailand at the World Trade
Organization (WTO) over cigarette exports. While the
Philippines may be in the right legally as it claims
that
Thailand
is violating WTO rules by effectively closing the doors
on Philippine-made cigarettes, there is also this matter
of moral ascendancy, which it seems to be lacking in
this particular case.
Manila
is reportedly accusing Bangkok of protecting the Thai
state-owned tobacco monopoly by indirectly imposing
higher customs duties and retail prices on imported
cigarettes, including those coming from Southeast Asian
trade partners like the
Philippines.
This is despite the fact that Manila is wont to using a
similar tactic—higher duties and taxes—on imported
cigarettes to protect Philippine manufacturers producing
cigarette “brands” accorded “legislative protection.”
These include the Marlboro brands, made in Batangas by
multinational Philip Morris, and the Winston brands made
by Fortune Tobacco Corp. of multibillionaire Lucio Tan.
Moreover, there seems to be something inherently amiss
with the Philippines in insisting on penetrating foreign
markets like Thailand with Philippine-produced products
that are scientifically known to cause danger to
people’s health. Litigation in the
United States
already highlighted this fact, with cigarette companies
made to pay huge amounts as settlement.
It is
for a good reason that local legislation requires
cigarette companies to label their products as dangerous
to one’s health. It is also for good reason that a local
law now limits the advertising of cigarettes. Public
health is paramount consideration, of course, regardless
of the investment and tax proceeds from the
cigarette-manufacturing industry. And in this sense, the
government should do anything and everything
constitutionally possible to regulate the sale of
tobacco products, particularly to minors.
That
said, it is a wonder how the same government can then
ask a foreign government, like that of Thailand, to
relax its own rules on tobacco sale by allowing more
liberal importation of cigarettes made in the
Philippines. And the issue is restraint of global trade?
What about the issue of public health in Thailand? And
while Bangkok may be more liberal in safeguarding the
health of its people, then let them do that under their
own terms. Does the
Philippines have
to be part of that?
A news
report noted that the issue began in August 2006.
Bangkok made an issue out of transfer-pricing,
suspecting that Philip Morris’s manufacturing plant in
Batangas was supplying allegedly undervalued cigarettes
to Philip Morris Thailand if only to reduce import
duties and taxes due on them.
But
taking the cudgels for Philip Morris, a major Philippine
investor, Manila complained that Bangkok has now been
implementing tax measures that allegedly intended to
simply protect the state-controlled Thai tobacco
monopoly, which by law has the sole right to manufacture
cigarettes in Thailand.
The
monopoly reportedly controls 80 percent of the Thai
cigarette market, and sells mostly cheap brands. Philip
Morris’s Batangas plant, meanwhile, reportedly sells
about 30 percent of its output—Marlboro and L&M
brands—to Thailand annually, concentrating on the
pricier market segments.
Manila’s
main complaint at the WTO is how Bangkok determines
customs values and maximum retail selling prices for
imported cigarettes, particularly those coming from
Philip Morris’s plant in Batangas. And Chris J. Nelson,
managing director of Philip Morris Philippines, was
quoted as saying in a news report that the Philippine
government has been “extremely cooperative” in assisting
Philip Morris in its campaign to clarify Bangkok’s trade
rules.
It seems
only fair that Philip Morris’s parent firm in
Switzerland is reportedly offering to help pay for legal
expenses to be incurred by Manila from the WTO suit.
After all, it will be questionable for the government to
spend public resources in what is obviously a private
tiff between competing cigarette makers. It remains
uncertain, however, whether there is a
conflict-of-interest issue here. But one can also easily
argue that the campaign will benefit not only Philip
Morris as a company, but also all its employees in the
Philippines, and all the tobacco farmers and other
suppliers working for Philip Morris locally.
And as
Philip Morris Philippines makes more money from selling
cigarettes to Thailand, then the Philippine government
also earns more from the taxes it pays. And that,
perhaps, makes the entire thing okay, even if smoking is
dangerous to one’s health.
Comments to matort@yahoo.com |