|
Leave it
to Citigroup Inc. to settle the raging debate about the
true might of China’s economy.
The
debate was prompted by a recent World Bank report
claiming the world’s No. 4 economy is far smaller than
believed. The new calculation, based on purchasing-power
parity, found that China produces 40-percent less output
than previous estimates.
The
largest US bank is proving wealth speaks louder than
statistics. Citigroup may be turning to the cash-rich
Chinese government for a handout, joining other
household names like Morgan Stanley.
It would
be the latest sign
China
is, according to Joseph Quinlan, chief market strategist
at Bank of America Capital Management, “America’s
Financial Sugar Daddy.” First came its $3-billion
investment in Blackstone Group LP, one of the most
capitalist of Wall Street vehicles. Now, “communist”
China is routinely bailing out the masters of the
financial universe.
China
is hardly Wall Street’s only savior.
Singapore’s
state-run Temasek Holdings Pte. tossed a $5-billion life
preserver at Merrill Lynch & Co. And now, after a
$7.5-billion investment from Abu Dhabi Investment
Authority, Citigroup may be getting a cash infusion from
China and Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.
Three
bubbles
On the
surface, all this back-scratching makes sense. Asian and
Gulf governments, with their currency reserves and oil
wealth, face a kind of embarrassment of riches and are
open to buying into Wall Street at fire-sale prices. In
the West subprime-mortgage losses have drained the
capital Citigroup and others keep as a cushion against
bad loans.
Yet,
such transactions of convenience are joining together
three of the world’s biggest bubbles:
China’s
economy, oil prices and Wall Street’s hubris.
The
Chinese bubble that gets the most attention is stocks.
The CSI 300 Index climbed 162 percent last year, even as
officials took steps to calm the market. In 2007 the
names of three Chinese banks and the word “stocks” beat
“sex” to become four of the most Googled words in China.
Another
bubble is a stockpile of currency reserves that is
approaching the equivalent of
Brazil’s
annual gross domestic product. Economists are wondering
about bubble troubles elsewhere. Officials are so
worried about inflation that they’re freezing price
increases of oil products, natural gas and electricity.
Oil boom
Oil
prices near $100 per barrel seem emblematic of the surge
in commodities. Prices for everything from grain to gold
to zinc are being driven higher by the rise of China,
India and other developing powers and speculation in
markets. While the commodities boom is crimping global
growth, its proceeds are enriching resource-rich
nations.
Saudi
Prince Alwaleed’s consumption patterns say it all. He’s
buying his own Airbus SAS A380 superjumbo jet for
personal use. That $319-million purchase in being
financed by a lack of energy conservation and efficiency
around the globe. That’s just fine by
Gulf states rolling in petrodollars and using them to extend their
global reach.
And then
there’s Wall Street’s hubris bubble. While it’s
manifested itself in myriad ways over the decades, the
most recent incarnation is among the most disturbing.
Banks sold risky loans to Americans least equipped to
understand or handle them. Then Wall Street
systematically packaged that risk in ways that hid the
dangers. Even as things unraveled, experts lined up to
say the turmoil would be “contained.” As if.
New
risks
Whether
serendipitous or by design, the connecting of these
three bubbles raises the stakes for the global financial
system. Here’s but one example: if China overheats or
its stocks plunge, Wall Street shares could take a hit
as investors bet on an end to bailouts from China Inc.
Or if Wall Street’s hubris resulted in even more bad
loans, China’s stocks could take a hit as investors mull
the fallout for
Asia’s No. 2 economy.
The
intermingling of a Wall Street on the ropes, a China on
the verge of overheating and obscene oil wealth is
creating a brave new world of finance. Indeed, the
thrust of Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World dovetails
nicely with what’s unfolding in global markets at the
moment.
Huxley
wasn’t thinking about Wall Street when he wrote his 1932
novel. Yet, the motto of the utopian world Huxley
created—“community, identity, stability”—isn’t all that
unlike what people from Federal Reserve Chairman Ben
Bernanke to Citigroup chief executive officer Vikram
Pandit to Chinese President Hu Jintao are trying to
achieve.
Brave
New World
Bernanke
and Pandit are interested in the stability of the global
financial community. While Hu shares that goal, he’s
also interested in creating a more global identity. This
is
China’s
moment, not only to spread its “soft power” but also its
influence over the global economy’s biggest players. A
bigger say in the International Monetary Fund is one
thing; pieces of Citigroup and others are nice to have,
too.
As the
world’s bubbles intersect, the challenges of the global
system arguably become more complex. It will be
interesting to watch them coexist, feed off and perhaps
even reinforce each other in the months ahead—or
frightening. |