|
SENATE
leaders are inclined to slash the reported P13.5-billion
budgetary insertions made by the House in the 2008
budget bill when the bicameral conference committee gets
back to work to reconcile conflicting provisions in the
Senate and House versions of the annual money measure,
according to Senate President Manuel Villar Jr.
“Masyadong
malaki iyan. Babawasan siguro iyan [It’s just too
big. We may have to cut it down],” Villar said, adding
that while the senators recognize the need for House
members to provide additional funds for projects in
their congressional districts, “masyadong malaki iyan
at hindi naman siguro pwedeng tanggapin lahat [It’s
just too big, and we cannot just accept all of it].”
In a
statement, Villar voiced confidence that the Senate and
House panels in the conference committee, co-chaired by
Sen. Juan Ponce Enrile and Rep. Edcel Lagman, will be
able to resolve differences in their respective versions
of the proposed national budget, including the
controversial provision on the alleged pork barrel
insertions.
“We are
already running on a reenacted budget, but I am sure the
bicameral conference committee in their meetings will be
able to reach an agreement so we can approve this
year’s General Appropriations Act,” said Villar.
He is
relying on Enrile and Lagman to come up with a
reconciled final version of the budget bill shortly so
that Congress can submit it to the President for signing
into law by next month.
But
Villar, at the same time, backed further scrutiny by the
conference committee of the huge appropriations in the
budget bill, particularly the alleged P13.5-billion
increase in congressmen’s pork barrel funds.
“Mabuti
na rin at naglalabasan ang mga problema na iyan. Syempre
kapag napapag-usapan ang mga pork barrel na
ganyan, nagkakaroon ng mga pagkakataon para bawasan
iyong dapat bawasan at ang mga nakakahiyang probisyon ay
tanggalin [It’s good all of these problems came out.
Of course, when discussions turn to the port barrel,
there comes a chance to slash what should be slashed and
remove embarrassing provisions],” Villar said.
This
developed as former senator Frank Drilon warned Congress
that the 2008 budget bill may be declared
“unconstitutional,” unless the House contingent
withdraws its “P13.5 extra pork barrel” during the
scheduled bicameral conference committee meeting set to
resume this week.
He said
Representative Lagman, who chairs the House
appropriations committee, should “stop insisting” that
the extra P13.5-billion pork barrel they have inserted
did not increase the President’s budget.
“No less
than Budget Secretary Rolando Andaya had publicly stated
that President Arroyo may veto the 2008 budget measure
for being unconstitutional because the House effectively
increased it by P8.3 billion,” Drilon said, adding, “It
appears that somebody was caught with his fingers in the
cookie jar.”
According to him, Article 6, Section 25 (1) of the 1987
Constitution specifically states that “Congress may not
increase the appropriations recommended by the President
for the operations of the government as specified in the
proposed national budget.”
Andaya
earlier insisted that Malacañang had no hand in the
P13.5-billion pork barrel “insertions” made by the House
that Drilon discovered.
In a
statement, Drilon dared both Malacañang and Congress to
waive their pork allocations in the 2008 budget to allow
the government to suspend the 12-percent value-added tax
on oil products without increasing the budget deficit,
and at the same time provide relief to consumers faced
with rising world oil prices. |